answersLogoWhite

0

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The supreme court ruled in korematsu v United States that the wartime internment of Japanese Americans was justified because of the military urgency of the situation what assumptions might have influ?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who was korematsuv US?

It is Korematsu v US and was a landmark Supreme Court decision allowing the USA government to place Japanese Americans in internment camps during WWII.


In Korematsu v. US the Supreme Court upheld which policy toward Japanese Americans?

removal to internment camps


What was the US Supreme Court case Korematsu v US about?

This was a case determining the constitutionality of putting Japanese Americans into "relocation" camps or internment camps. The Supreme Court decided that internment camps were constitutional because of military urgency, and that protection from espionage far outweighed Korematsu's (and thus all Japanese American's) individual rights.


Who was the Japanese-American who sued the us for discrimination due to internment camps?

Fred Korematsu


Who won the US Supreme Court case Korematsu v US?

The United States won, as Fred Korematsu was not granted his appeal and was sent to an internment camp, and none of the Japanese-American's cases were looked into. This fool has no idea what he is talking about... he was not even close to knowing what really happened with Fred Korematsu. Korematsu won this as some would say "battle" against the United States. Fred Korematsu did not have to go to the internment camp.


What did the supreme court decide in Korematsu v. US?

The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy


What did the American public think of the internment camps?

After the attacks on Pearl Harbor, many white Americans began to distrust Japanese Americans and their patriotic loyalties. Also, the Japanese Navy's location was unknown at the time, and thus many believed that a Japanese attack on the west coast could have occurred at any time. Many white Americans believed that Japanese Americans could provide intelligence for the Imperial Japanese forces, and that if the Japanese Navy were to attack the west coast, Japanese Americans would join the invaders and help fight against the United States. Many white Americans believed that the internment was justified, and the US Supreme Court agreed. In Korematsu v. United States, the Supreme Court ok'd the internment of Japanese Americans, citing public safety and protection against espionage to be a valid reason for internment and the taking of civil rights and liberties from Japanese Americans.


Which landmark supreme court case outcome sided with the us government concerning the constitutionality of executive order 9066 which ordered japanese americans into internment camps during world?

Korematsu v. United States


What did the supreme court decide in case korematsu v. US?

The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy


What role did the military play in the Court's Decision in the Korematsu case?

The U.S. military's argued that the loyalties of some Japanese Americans resided not with the United States but with their ancestral country, and that because separating "the disloyal from the loyal" was a logistical impossibility, the internment order had to apply to all Japanese Americans within the restricted area. The Supreme Court Accepted the military's argument over the argument of Korematsu.


What is the significance of korematsu v. us?

Korematsu v United States (1944) remains a profound case and precedent in the study of civil liberties and American Constitutional law. The chief significance was the Courts majority opinion that national security (against espionage) was a compelling interest enough that the use of internment was/is justified.


What landmark Supreme Court case outcome sided with the U.S. government concerning the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066 which ordered Japanese Americans into internment camps during World Wa?

Korematsu v. United States