Had a responsibility to spread the benfits of Western civilization
Racism rarely played a direct role in imperialism but was an important factor nonetheless. States generally act in their own interests, and in a way that maximizes those interests. However, Europeans (just like anyone else) are people, and people aren't comfortable with subjugating others in a general sense. Imperialism was something that was viewed as beneficial to the national interests of European states, and so they pursued imperial aims, but in order to justify those aims they generally ran to racist arguments; for instance, the British "burden of the white man" or the French "spreading civilization". All of these actions were taken to further the national interest but were justified in humane terms. Because they were uniformly manifested as the "whites" helping the backwards "others", subconscious racism was certainly involved, although never the chief objective.
taking away my belief.I am a mixture of Mayas and spanish and cultural imperialism simply means this. The europeans came over to our land and impose upon our people their believes and tradition regardless the natives wanted or not. Those that dare to oppose were killed. The many that fought, fought with arrows and other weapons that were like a toy when compared to the Europeans gunns and cannons etc. Polo5021 edit:Cultural imperialism is also the passive acceptance of cultures, this can be accepting goods and services or people trying to better themself's in the image of that culture.For example the adoption of the American street culture.
The US involved Vietnam War was NOT about imperialism. Imperialism means the acquiring of an empire...such as colonies. The US wanted to keep any nation free from "communism." South Vietnam was one of those countries.
Answer this question… The Ming dynasty operated trade networks primarily over land, while Europeans operated them over oceans.
Imperialism is when a stronger country takes control of a weaker country. It is still important today, even though many such relationships are over, because cultural influences remain in those areas and have become part of the culture of smaller countries.
Had a responsibility to spread the benfits of Western civilization
Had a responsibility to spread the benfits of Western civilization
Interesting stutter you've got there.The basic claim was that Europeans had a moral duty to run the countries of non-Europeans "for their own good", since it was patently obvious that white people were just better at running things; that is, the argument was that they weren't taking over countries out of ambition or greed, but instead reluctantly forcing themselves to do so because "those people" were just not competent.Kipling's poem sums it up pretty well: "Go bind your sons to exile to serve your captives' need".You may agree, or disagree, with that sentiment, but it adequately reflects the argument that was being made.
Imperialism is when a nation colonizes another nation or territory. The Europeans believed that imperialism was important because they said that it was their responsibility to civilize those who they believed were inferior to them and because they wanted the other nations' resources.
Europeans believed they should conquer other lands to help those places become industrialized.
Racism rarely played a direct role in imperialism but was an important factor nonetheless. States generally act in their own interests, and in a way that maximizes those interests. However, Europeans (just like anyone else) are people, and people aren't comfortable with subjugating others in a general sense. Imperialism was something that was viewed as beneficial to the national interests of European states, and so they pursued imperial aims, but in order to justify those aims they generally ran to racist arguments; for instance, the British "burden of the white man" or the French "spreading civilization". All of these actions were taken to further the national interest but were justified in humane terms. Because they were uniformly manifested as the "whites" helping the backwards "others", subconscious racism was certainly involved, although never the chief objective.
Rudyard Kipling intended for readers to view imperialism as a noble and moral duty for the white man, implying that it is the responsibility of the more advanced civilizations to uplift and civilize the less developed ones. However, modern interpretations often criticize the poem for its racist and colonialist undertones.
But these " core commonwealth values " have been those imposed by british imperialism and interpreted to suit its interests.
No. Even the apostle Paul was dismissive of those who claimed to speak in tongues, although he was not prepared to alienate those who claimed this ability.
Imperialism :-)
This quote from Rudyard Kipling's poem "The White Man's Burden" suggests that those in positions of power or authority must bear the burden of blame and criticism from both those they try to help and those they try to control. They must also endure the burden of fulfilling the expectations and demands of those they are responsible for, even when it is challenging or unpopular.
Because of the Europeans military power which were superior than those of africans