0
Two scientists do not agree on which type of grocery bag is better for the environment. What is the most likely outcome of their disagreement A. More studies will take place on the issue B. Some decre?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why might it be important for scientists to be able to communicate their methods and their findings?
Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.
Scientists may disregard data that conflicts with their personal preferences?
Highly unlikely, a good scientist would never jeopardise the outcome of any study or trial.
What is most likely outcome of the damage to the nodules?
The outcome is most likely a lack of nitrogen-fixing bacteria to produce the nutrients for the clovers.
What is the outcome of asexual reproduction?
What is the outcome of one mitotic division?
I have no clue
two scientist do not agree on which type of grocery bag is better for the environment. what is most likely outcome of their disagreement?
more studies will take place on the issue
What are the components of therapeutic environment?
all the factors in the environment that affects the outcome of the patient's condition
What is the outcome in an ideal environment for sexual reproduction?
Healthy offsprings are produced
Two scientists do not agree on which type of grocery bag is better for the environment. What is the most likely outcome of their disagreement?
they will gather more evidence before reaching a conclusion more studies of issues will be done
How do scientists make predictions?
Scientists make predictions with a hypothesis. Using their observations, models, and other scientists' work, they create a statement of a possible outcome called a hypothesis. Then scientists design tests to check whether their prediction was true.
Why do scientists find it important to use a control in an experiment?
So scientists can know for certain if the factor they're testing affects the outcome and isn't caused by another factor which isn't being measured. It elimiantes the chance of another factor affecting the outcome of an experiment.
Negative effects of man and his environment?
control the outcome,never give up
What about 2012 outcome?
Fortune tellers and scientists say that all disasters will happen on 12/12/12.
Why are the mental pictures that scientists use useful?
so they can picture the outcome or make a mental picture of it.~Hannah .B.
What If an organization fails to produce outputs valued in the external environment whiat is likely the outcome?
disintegration
What if two scientists do not agree on which type of grocery bag is better for the environment. what is the most likely outcome of their disagreement?
Scientists do not have to agree, both can publish their results and see if peer discussion resolves the issue. If, for some reason, one point of view had to win, then much work would be involved.In this question the definition of the word "better" would be central point of initial discussion. Does better mean:strongermore biodegradablecheapercause less waste and pollution during manufacturerequire less energy to makehave a lower carbon footprintbe reusablesell sterilizingtastyThese options would have to be discussed before any reasonable further work would be possible.Then, an agreement would have to be made on:sample sizeanalytic methodsapplicable criteriadata evaluationtesting procedures and analysisacceptable funding sourcesacceptable bag originsacceptable stakeholder inputAfter all this scientific study, the public (users of the bag) might not agree and could just go on using whatever bag they wanted.
What is the name given to a written decision by Supreme Court Justices that while they agree with the final outcome of the case they do not agree with the reasoning behind the final outcome?
It is a concurring opinion. If there is no disagreement with the basis, the justice is included in the "majority opinion." In some cases, concurring opinions can become plurality decisions.
