Malcolm X use NON - Violent! But some of his supporters did get violent.
None. Malcolm X threatened the use of violence (in self defense) to deter would-be aggression towards him.
yes Malcolm X was a real person. A more violent Civil Rights activist of the 1960's.
to abandon, violent, militant tactics in favor of civil disobedience
There were a few that preached a military approach. The ones that come to mind right now are Huey Newton, Stokely Carmichael and Malcolm X.
two civil rights leaders. mlk was passive, malcolm x was violent... but then again, who could blame him?
well im not sure really working on it though...lol
violent methods wheras Martin Luther Kings had peaceful and non-voilent methods they both had the same goal but a different method to achieve it =]=]
Malcolm X
Malcom x, unlike Martin Luther king jr., believed that self-defense, in response to racism, was an intelligent way of handling things. Martin Luther King says that violence, in response to racism, is both immoral and immpractical and only causes distruction to both parties. This is why MLK and Malcolm X disagree. Though they respect each other dearly, they both disagree on the subjct of using violence. Some people disagree with Malcolm x and say that non-violent protest is impractical. Malcolm X= Violent protest is intelligent. Martin Luther King Jr.= Any form of violence is wrong.
Malcolm X
what were Malcolm X's goals