No, New Hampshire was the most religious and politically tolerant of the New England colonies. Rhode Island was tied with New Hampshire for religious tolerance but Rhode Island disagreed with the Union on most events.
The short answer has to be "yes". At it's founding by Roger Williams, in 1636, fifty years before that of Pennsylvania, the colony of Rhode Island welcomed both Jews and Quakers amongst other minority groups, and treated the native Indians with respect and equity. Roger Williams had been about to be deported back to England by the Colony of Massachusetts for his views in favour of the separation between church and state. He escaped and went on to found Providence and, subsequently, the colony of Rhode Island.
Yes Rhode Island was. Most of the time Rhode Island was referred to as "The Sewer".
well a similarity in the new England colonies is that shipbuilding was a main industry and in the southern colonies it was to
nope!
because the middle colonies had milder climate than the new england
Religiously - calvinism was gaining strength in Scotland and this would lead to presbyterianism. Politically - the aftermath of the English civil war.
Taxes without representation and appointed governorships.
This was a result of the Puritans choosing to leave England in favor of a land more tolerant of religious views.
I am pretty sure that this was Pennsylvania. (But I am not 100% sure). William Penn was a very religiously tolerant, peaceful man, but was pressured by England to deny rights to Catholics and Jews.
The Middle Colonies were more ethnically and religiously diverse than the other British colonies. Unlike the other British colonies, they actually had written freedom of religion laws. See link provided-
It depends what colony. Yes, some colonies, such as Pennslyvania, Rhode Island, and Conecticut were tolerant according to religions, but colonies such as Maryland were not
Pennsylvania's religious establishment provided monetary support to all Protestant religious groups.
Not really.