He:
Nothing
There's no consensus on whether King John was a good king. Many consider him to have been a bad ruler, but others think he was effective. Regardless of the presence of dissenting opinions, he tends to be portrayed negatively in the media.
In which country?Bad king John of England was held captive in England of course. John the Good was probably held captive in England or France.
Because when King John was around nobles didn't pay taxes so the porr had to pay loads, and they could not afford that.
Henry VII wasn't a good defender, and he wasn't a very nice person either. Henry VIII was a good King, and looked after England well, but was a womanizer and wasn't very nice to his wives.
my friend it is king henry because king john is a good king in them days
king john had 2 sons for heres and kept clean
he was a bad soldier because he was a bad leader and showed the path of the other people the wrong side .
In many books in recent years, the info and discussions show that king john was a good leader in war, good at improvisation, good at thinking and good strategic. The monkish chronicles in 1206 state that he was a very bad but this information was biased as the monks didn't like him as he was mean to the pope and increased taxes. The portrayal of king John in robin hood shows his bad side which may or may not be true.
Nothing
There's no consensus on whether King John was a good king. Many consider him to have been a bad ruler, but others think he was effective. Regardless of the presence of dissenting opinions, he tends to be portrayed negatively in the media.
he played with his own poop REALLY!!!!!!!!!
ov corse : )
no, simple as, all he did was lose it.
João II (John II) of Portugal renamed the southern tip of Africa the Cape of Good Hope. King John not just john
because he was against them and not on their side
he never left his land...he always stayed where he thought he should. He signed the magna carta. John stopped the Welsh and Scotts from attacking England.