answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Since the early 1960s a number of German historians have argued - very convincingly, on the basis of German and Austro-Hungarian documents - that the German General Staff was indeed responsible for deliberating escalating the crisis caused in June-July 1914 into a major war. The best known of these historians is Fritz Fischer (1908-1999). Fischer stressed that in saying this he wasn't supporting Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles, which treated every German man, woman and child as guilty. The gist of the theory is that the General Staff urged the government of Austria-Hungary to be provocative and completely unreasonable in its dealings with Serbia. Among the most telling documents are those relating to the time when it looked as if the "doves" in Vienna were getting the upper hand. The horror on the part of the German General Staff of being, as it were, cheated of their jolly little war was boundless. In West Germany, when the implications of Fischer's theory became clear - namely that something had been fundamentally rotten in Germany for long before 1933 - the reaction to Fischer's hypotheis was *rage*. However, within a few years it became widely accepted. More recently it has been modified and altered, however. Well known historians who have echoed Fritz Fischer's interpretation (often with qualifications) include Hans-Ulrich Wehler (b. 1931) and Wolfgang Mommsen (1930-2004).

User Avatar

Wiki User

17y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Were German militarism and diplomacy responsible for World War 1?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How was German militarism and diplomacy NOT responsible for World War I?

I am wondering if you had to do this as a debate topic in history class. Currently I am researching the same topic. Some things I have come up with include: nationalism, militarism, imperialism, and the alliance system. There is no way denying the fact that German militarism and diplomacy were not responsible for world war 1....because they were. One could just argue that they were not the primary factors and one country cannot soley be blamed for the genesis of world war I.


What is an appropriate summation of the increasing militarism that lead to World War 1?

European leaders were relying more on their military strength than on diplomacy.


What is an appropriate summation of the increasing militarism that helped lead to World War 1?

European leaders were relying more on their military strength than on diplomacy.


What is an appropriate summation of the increasing militarism that help lead world war 1?

European leaders were relying more on their military strength than on diplomacy.


What foreign policy did president Woodrow Wilson adopt when world war 1 broke out?

It was called missionary diplomacy.


What is nationalism and militarism and how did they impact World War 1?

Example of Nationalism durring WWI : The assassination of Duke Franz Ferdinand Example of Militarism durring WWI: The British and German struggle to be the greatest naval power (dreadnots)


Why was there a World War 2 Battle?

Mainly because of Imperialism and Militarism. The Nazi German "Blitzkrieg" of Poland in 1939 would start the War.


When was Diplomacy World created?

Diplomacy World was created in 1974.


Was stopping German militarism worth the loss of life in world war 1?

yes it was cause if we had not stopped them we would be in a bad placer right now.


Who was the German leader responsible for World War 2?

Adolf Hitler


What is a sentence using the word militarism?

Germany's militarism was strong and prideful during World War 1.


What has the author Alfred Vagts written?

Alfred Vagts has written: 'Hitler's second army' -- subject(s): Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiter-Partei, World War, 1939-1945 'Defense and diplomacy' -- subject(s): Diplomatic and consular service, History, International relations, Military policy, Modern Military history, World politics 'A history of militarism, romance and realities' -- subject(s): Militarism, Military History 'Bilanzen und Balancen' -- subject(s): Addresses, essays, lectures, History, International finance, World politics 'The military attache ' 'A history of militarism, civilian and military' -- subject(s): Militarism, Military History, Military history