answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

classical conditioning, identified by Pavlov, involves learning through associations using stimulus & response pairings. Operant conditioning involves learning through a series of rewards & punishments.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

Classical conditioning involves associating an involuntary response with a stimulus, such as Pavlov's dogs associating a bell with food. Operant conditioning involves learning through reinforcement or punishment of voluntary behaviors, such as receiving a reward for completing a task. In classical conditioning, the response is automatic, while in operant conditioning, the individual's behavior operates on the environment.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the differences between classical conditioning and operant condioning?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Psychology

Is involuntary and voluntary a classical or operant conditioning?

Involuntary conditioning is associated with classical conditioning, while voluntary conditioning is associated with operant conditioning. Classical conditioning involves learning by association between stimuli, while operant conditioning involves learning by reinforcement or punishment of behaviors.


Both classical and operant conditioning are forms of?

Both classical and operant conditioning are forms of associative learning, where behavior is influenced through the process of forming associations between stimuli and responses. In classical conditioning, the association is between two stimuli, while in operant conditioning, the association is between a behavior and its consequence.


What are the variables affecting classical conditioning?

The key variables affecting classical conditioning include the timing of the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli, the strength of the stimuli, the predictability of the association between the stimuli, and the intensity of the response to the unconditioned stimulus. These variables can influence the effectiveness and rate of learning in classical conditioning.


In classical conditioning are important while in operating conditioning are primary for learning?

In classical conditioning, the association between the neutral stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus is important for learning, leading to a conditioned response. In operant conditioning, reinforcement and punishment are primary for learning as they influence the likelihood of a behavior being repeated in the future.


Who proposed the contingency theory for classical conditioning?

Robert Rescorla and Allan Wagner proposed the contingency theory for classical conditioning. This theory suggests that learning occurs when there is a predictive relationship between a conditioned stimulus and an unconditioned stimulus.

Related questions

What are the differences between classical food web and present food web?

The differences is that the classical are more harder. And the present is more visual.


Essentially classical conditioning is a process of learning an between two stimuli?

Classical conditioning is a type of learning in which an organism associates two stimuli, leading to a learned response. This process involves pairing a neutral stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus to create a conditioned response. Over time, the neutral stimulus alone can evoke the same response as the unconditioned stimulus.


What are the major differences between classical and modern menus?

The differences between classical and modern menus is that classical menus have more expensive and uniqe foods. Modern menus have the same food that we mostly eat today and is less expensive then then the classical menus.


An organism learns associations between events it does not control during the process of?

Classical Conditioning


Compare and contrast operant and classical conditioning?

Classical conditioning is best known by Pavlov's dogs. This type of conditioning takes a neutral stimulus and makes a person or animal respond to it. Operant conditioning uses punishment to get a behavior to stop.


What is the best way to differentiate operant conditioning from classical conditioning?

Operant conditioning involves learning through consequences (rewards or punishments) for behaviors, while classical conditioning involves learning through associations between two stimuli. In operant conditioning, the focus is on the behavior itself and its consequences, while in classical conditioning, the focus is on involuntary responses to stimuli.


What are the differences between Japanese and Korean literature?

often written in Classical Chinese.


Difference between classical and traditional technology?

There are a few differences between classical and traditional technology. Traditional technology is something that has always been done and classical technology is something that was once done.


What are the differences between classical and spectroscopic method of chemical analysis?

compare and contrast classical method and spectroscopic method of analysis in chemistry


In classical conditioning what is the process called in which the animal develops an association between the unconditioned stimulus and the neutral stimulus?

The process is called "acquisition" in classical conditioning. During acquisition, the neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus that elicits a response similar to the unconditioned stimulus.


What are the differences between classical and contemporary sociological theories?

Classical sociological theories focus on the macro-level analysis of society, emphasizing structures and institutions. They include theories like functionalism and conflict theory. Contemporary sociological theories, on the other hand, often incorporate a more micro-level perspective, highlighting individual agency, identities, and everyday interactions. They include theories like symbolic interactionism and postmodernism.


What are the differences between tantric and classical yoga philosophy?

dualist vs non-dualist