GOOD-They were good because the were highly protective and strong.
BAD-People could dig under the castle,make a fire-Therefore the stones would heat up and crack, making it easier for the enemy to attack and brake the stone wall.
mine around it
William the Conqueror first built stone keep castles to show that he is not scared of the British
No, concentric castles were built after stone keep castles.
im not sure.....
King William the I (William the conqueror) didn't build all his castles out of stone. In fact, most of the castles he built were made out of wood. These wooden castles were called Motte and Bailey castles. The castles that hedid build out of stone were called Stone Keep Castles (Stone Castles). King William built the Stone Keep Castles out of stone because stone is stronger than wood, doesn't rot within a few years and doesn't burn easily.
Motte and bailey castles, Stone keep castles and Concentric castles
Stone keep castles were built in 11th - 13th centuries.
Stone.
stone
Square keep castles (or stone keep castles) were made out of stone; you can probably tell from the name! Hope this helps.
motte and bailey, stone keep castles and concentric castles
the good things for a stone keep castles are: hard to set fire on the stone strong high (motte+bailey castle has weak wood so a srong bull could knock it down!) the keep was taller than the walls so the defenders could see enemies!) thats all.
Becuase of me
This depends on what type of castle your referring to. In the Norman times, there were two different types of castles built. There were Motte and Bailey castles and Stone keep castles (Stone castles). The Motte and Bailey castles were made out of wood and the Stone keep castles were made out of stone (obviously).
they all did IT.
stone and wood
No, all castles are different in some way. These are the different types of castles: * Motte and Bailey castles (made out of wood) * Stone keep castles or just stone castles (made out of stone) * Concentric castles (also made out of stone)