Both like to play in their backyard.
Children are children, no matter where they grow up. They like to smile and laugh and play games. Jewish children and Palestinian children are no different from one another. It is when they mature and develop unique perspectives that they start to diverge.
No. The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is something that actually exists. There is no such thing as the Indian-Palestinian Conflict. Therefore, they cannot be the same thing. Perhaps you mean the Indian-Pakistani Conflict, which is a real conflict, but a different one from the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Both conflicts are similar in that there were two different groups of people were living in the same former colony that wanted to each form their own country and did so with varying degrees of success.
Palestinian terrorists hide behind women and children while firing on Israeli troops, and the Israeli's defend themselves hitting the children.
Zionism is certainly one of the causes of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. It is not the only cause of the conflict and is also not the most important cause of the conflict.
International focus groups and thinktanks have come up with solutions and there have been several peace treaties attempted, but there are too many people who are too unwilling to compromise to implement them. People on both sides are far too interested in justice and not interested enough in peace and tranquility.None of the serious issues that inflame the conflict have really been resolved. To read about the causes of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, please see the Related Question below.What are the causes of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict?What are the causes of the Jewish-Arab Conflict?
This question is difficult to answer for two reasons. Firstly, there are two conflicts going on in Palestine (the first is the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and the second is the Palestinian Civil War and related violence). Secondly, opinions widely vary as to what the causes of these conflicts are. It is likely that religion is a bigger player in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict than the Palestinian Civil War. A strong argument can be made that either conflict is not based on religion in any substantial way and strong arguments can also be made that religion is the defining aspect of these conflicts. In depends on more on the person than anything else. Personally, I do not find the "religion" angle terribly appealing in either case. I think the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is a ethnic nationalist conflict and that the Palestinian Civil War is a war fought for political control. Please see the Related Questions below for more information on both conflicts.
The Arab-Palestinian Conflict is the informal name given to the several Arab-Palestinian Battles and intermittent and long periods of Palestinian mistreatment at Arab hands. In fact, roughly as many Palestinians have died as a result of the Arab-Palestinian Conflict as the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict to date.
There is no such thing as the "Israeli-Palestinian Movement". There is the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, about which more can be read at the Related Question below: What is the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict?
No. The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is something that actually exists. There is no such thing as the Indian-Palestinian Conflict. Therefore, they cannot be the same thing. Perhaps you mean the Indian-Pakistani Conflict, which is a real conflict, but a different one from the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Both conflicts are similar in that there were two different groups of people were living in the same former colony that wanted to each form their own country and did so with varying degrees of success.
Jerusalem, West Bank and Gaza Strip are at the center of the Israeli- Palestinian conflict.
Palestinian terrorists hide behind women and children while firing on Israeli troops, and the Israeli's defend themselves hitting the children.
There is an important distinction between actuality and intentionality. Actuality is what occurs, regardless of desires and intentionality is purpose and rationale. There is certainly an actuality that the Israeli Army has been responsible for the death of Palestinian Children and there is also certainly an actuality that Palestinian Militant and Terror Organizations have caused the death of Palestinian children. It is very important to note, however, that there is no intention in the Israeli Army, no memorandum, and no unofficial desire to kill Palestinian non-combatants (which includes children). The deaths of Palestinian children are regrettable and if the violence were to cease on both sides, Palestinian children would not have to worry about being embroiled in a conflict where both their country and another could end them.
similarities and difference conflict and violence
Roughly 14,500 individuals have died as a result of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Over 80% of the casualties have been Palestinian.
There are many reasons for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but most of them stem from the nationalist movements of the Jews and the Arabs which seeked to gain sovereignity.
There is no such thing as "the Israeli Palestinian". If you meant to ask about "the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict", please see the Related Question below.
Answer 1Unlike the terrorists, Israel does not target civilians.Answer 2There is an important distinction between actuality and intentionality. Actuality is what occurs, regardless of desires and intentionality is purpose and rationale. There is certainly an actuality that the Israeli Army has been responsible for the death of Palestinian Children and there is also certainly an actuality that Palestinian Militant and Terror Organizations have caused the death of Palestinian children. It is very important to note, however, that there is no intention in the Israeli Army, no memorandum, and no unofficial desire to kill Palestinian non-combatants (which includes children). The deaths of Palestinian children are regrettable and if the violence were to cease on both sides, Palestinian children would not have to worry about being embroiled in a conflict where both their country and another could end them.
Yes. Killing children is an immoral act under any circumstances. Whether or not that should be used to tar an entire armed forces or government of a country should be connected to intentionality. There is an important distinction between actuality and intentionality. Actuality is what occurs, regardless of desires and intentionality is purpose and rationale. There is certainly an actuality that the Israeli Army has been responsible for the death of Palestinian Children and there is also certainly an actuality that Palestinian Militant and Terror Organizations have caused the death of Palestinian children. It is very important to note, however, that there is no intention in the Israeli Army, no memorandum, and no unofficial desire to kill Palestinian non-combatants (which includes children). The deaths of Palestinian children are regrettable and if the violence were to cease on both sides, Palestinian children would not have to worry about being embroiled in a conflict where both their country and another could end them.