It was a legal dispute about the status of a slave who had lived on free soil for a time and then returned to slave country.
The courts had never dealt with this question before, and that is how it reached the Supreme Court, where the Chief Justice made his controversial statements about slavery and blacks in general.
Basically, slaves were later denied the right to sue in court because they were not citizens. Also, this was overall a pointless case because enslaved people couldn't win freedom just because they lived in a free territory or state..
The US Supreme Court said that slaves were not citizens and therefore had no right to bring suit in Federal court, and that the Federal government had no authority to decide whether a State would be "slave" or "free." See related link.
Slavery was the entire point of why the US Supreme Court heard the Dred Scott case. Scott's contention was that he gained his freedom based on being in a free state when his "master" died.
People who opposed slavery were against the US Supreme Court's decision on the Dred Scott case. Pro-slavery people felt the opposite way. It should be noted, however, there was no groundswell actions to pass an amendment to the US Constitution to abolish slavery.
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
dred scott
The Dred Scott decision by the US Supreme Court weakened the case for those Americans that believed slavery had to be abolished. It strengthened the belief, held mostly in the South, that slavery was Constitutional. The South was elated, and Northerners who opposed slavery were shocked.
People of all states could decide if they wanted slavery withing their borders. A+Ls: The supreme court declared scott was a free man
The US Supreme Court decision on the Dred Scott case resulted in the court making it clear that Scott could not be a free man and denied his case to be free of his slavery status. The Court declared that Scott was not a US citizen, and thus could not sue for his freedom.
Dred Scott
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
dred scott
The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.
The Dred Scott decision by the US Supreme Court weakened the case for those Americans that believed slavery had to be abolished. It strengthened the belief, held mostly in the South, that slavery was Constitutional. The South was elated, and Northerners who opposed slavery were shocked.
The Dred Scott decision by the US Supreme Court in 1857 confirmed what large scale slave owners in the south always believed. That was that slavery was legal under the US Constitution. The Court's decision was controversial, however, only a constitutional amendment could change that decision.
The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.
The Supreme Court eventually decided to give Dred Scott his freedom. They made that decision because they thought that it would end the huge slavery crisis. A few weeks after Dred Scott was freed, he sadly died. :(
Because the decision showed that the Supreme Court didn't think that any State could outlaw slavery.
the decision made slavery legal in all us territories that were not yet states
The Dred Scott decision.
The Supreme Court declared Scott was a free man