answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It was a legal dispute about the status of a slave who had lived on free soil for a time and then returned to slave country.

The courts had never dealt with this question before, and that is how it reached the Supreme Court, where the Chief Justice made his controversial statements about slavery and blacks in general.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

Basically, slaves were later denied the right to sue in court because they were not citizens. Also, this was overall a pointless case because enslaved people couldn't win freedom just because they lived in a free territory or state..

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

The US Supreme Court said that slaves were not citizens and therefore had no right to bring suit in Federal court, and that the Federal government had no authority to decide whether a State would be "slave" or "free." See related link.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

Slavery was the entire point of why the US Supreme Court heard the Dred Scott case. Scott's contention was that he gained his freedom based on being in a free state when his "master" died.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

People who opposed slavery were against the US Supreme Court's decision on the Dred Scott case. Pro-slavery people felt the opposite way. It should be noted, however, there was no groundswell actions to pass an amendment to the US Constitution to abolish slavery.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did the US Supreme Court Dred Scott decision say about slavery?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who was the subject of a supreme court decision on slavery?

Dred Scott


What are facts about the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?


What supreme court decision overturned efforts to limit the spread of slavery?

dred scott


What Supreme Court decision in effect meant that the Constitution protected slavery?

The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.


How did the nation respond to the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision?

The Dred Scott decision by the US Supreme Court weakened the case for those Americans that believed slavery had to be abolished. It strengthened the belief, held mostly in the South, that slavery was Constitutional. The South was elated, and Northerners who opposed slavery were shocked.


Why did southern slavery supporters approve of the Dred Scott US Supreme Court's decision?

The Dred Scott decision by the US Supreme Court in 1857 confirmed what large scale slave owners in the south always believed. That was that slavery was legal under the US Constitution. The Court's decision was controversial, however, only a constitutional amendment could change that decision.


What Supreme Court decision in effect meant the Constitution protected slavery?

The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.


What did the supreme court in its decision in the dred Scott case?

The Supreme Court eventually decided to give Dred Scott his freedom. They made that decision because they thought that it would end the huge slavery crisis. A few weeks after Dred Scott was freed, he sadly died. :(


Why were abolitionist angered by the Dred Scott decision?

Because the decision showed that the Supreme Court didn't think that any State could outlaw slavery.


What describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

the decision made slavery legal in all us territories that were not yet states


In 1857 the Supreme Court took a pro-slavery stand that pushed the US closer toward war This decision was known as what?

The Dred Scott decision.


Which of these was not a result of the Dred Scott U.S. supreme court decision?

The Supreme Court declared Scott was a free man