So-called "Roman" Catholics know just about as much as anyone else concerning the Romans. If ancient Rome is interesting to them, they learn about the culture just as anyone else. There is no such thing as a "Roman Catholic". The name of the church is Catholic and its members are called Catholic. The term "Roman Catholic" is a misnomer probably stemming from the fact that the Vatican, the church headquarters, is situated in the city of Rome itself.
Lord Baltimore wanted Maryland to be a sanctuary for disenfranchised Roman Catholics. Roman and Orthodox Catholicism was not popular in the American colonies.
Hibernia was the Roman name for Ireland.
This question is to unclear and is impossible to answer. What do you mean what where Roman used for? Do you know that the Romans were and still are people? They are people form Rome.
Yes, Romans did build the roman baths...if they didn't, it wouldn't be called ''Roman-Bath''
The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.
The Habsburgs are an Austrian royal dynasty whose members have belonged to the Catholic Church for centuries. Like most people in Western Europe, they are Catholics of the Latin (Roman) Rite. Thus, they are Roman Catholics. However, it is important to note that not all Catholics are Romans.
Roman Catholic AnswerUkranian Catholics ARE Roman Catholics, so NO, they Mass if not like Roman Catholics it is Roman Catholic.
Know- Nothings
Roman Catholics normally refer to themselves are Catholics or Roman Catholics. Sometimes they use a name associated with a religious if more clarity is desired.
None. Roman Catholics are Christian.
Most are Roman-Catholics Most are Roman-Catholics
Do you mean Roman Catholics?
Roman Catholic was made when the Romans became Christian's. The Romans believed in different things than other Christians/Catholics.Some people think/believe that roman Catholicism is the true church, whilst other believe that it is a branch from the religion Christianity, which then in turn is a branch of Judaism. Roman Catholics were founded by Jesus, there savior of mankind. Christianity however was founded by God, in the beginning.
There are numerous Catholics in the Netherlands.
No, not all Romans were catholics. It was only when Emperor Constantine I (who converted to Christianity in the early fourth century AD), passed laws in the Edict of Milan, that catholics were no longer allowed to be persecuted. Before then, there was little religious tolerance of any other religions in Roman society outside Paganism.
It was Roman Catholics who settled in the area that King Charles I had given to George Calvert. Charles I of England lived from 1600 to 1649.
Lord Baltimore wanted Maryland to be a sanctuary for disenfranchised Roman Catholics. Roman and Orthodox Catholicism was not popular in the American colonies.