Want this question answered?
support
Fjh
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
Democritus
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
They plotted a graph that correlated the increase in CO2 to the rise in average temperature of the earth and assumed since they were similar it must be fact.
I do not so much " believe it " as I an convinced by the myriad lines of converging evidences that support the theory of evolution by natural selection. talkorigins.org
Corroborate means to strengthen or support with evidence.
Most believe that he was born in Haiti, but there is no documentary evidence to support or refute that belief.
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
use scientific evidence to support your answer
If you believe in the concept of a soul then it is invisible, bodiless and shapeless. So far their is no evidence to support the concept of a soul though anyone with any evidence should post it in the discussion
Yes, an incredulous person can come to believe in what is happening if they are presented with enough evidence or convincing argument to support the truth of the situation. Their initial skepticism can be overcome with strong evidence and reasoning.
I think there is, there is photographic evidence and i am currently working on the scientific evidence. (i.e how deep does the lochness have to be and could it support the monster?)=if anyone finds any pure evidence the let me know by answering this question: is the any pure evidence for the lochness monster?=
Some believe so, and there is some evidence to support the idea. But, he failed miserably by leaving Stalin to take his place.
Is the evidence from the best source I can find
The most widely accepted answer to this question is no, there is no scientific evidence that angels exist. There are some who believe that seeing science cannot disprove angels exist either, the evidence is inconclusive. This is known as the burden of proof.