There was the Missouri Compromise of 1820, drawing a line in the sand - no slavery North of that line. This kept the peace for thirty years.
Then there was the Compromise of 1850, over the vastnew territories acquired from Mexico. This one didn't last.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act, allowing a local vote, caused immediate bloodshed ('Bleeding Kansas'), and was judged a failure.
Finally, the Crittenden Compromise, presented to the newly-elected Abraham Lincoln - rejected because it could have allowed the creation of new slave-states.
the decision made slavery legal in all us territories that were not yet states
The issue of expansion of slavery was its expansion and growth into Western territories.
Stephen Douglas' Freeport Doctrine referred to the proposal that territories had the right to refuse slavery if they chose. This was against a Supreme Court decision. The doctrine was espoused in his debates with Abraham Lincoln in 1858.
They didn't want let let slavery spread to the western territories
The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820 with the popular sovereignty portion of the bill was written into the proposal. This portion of the bill was to allow the voters of the movement to decide if slavery would be allowed within the states that were formed because of the Act. Douglas hoped that popular sovereignty would allow democracy to win and he would not have to pick a side on the issues of slavery and slave rights. But indignation fanned out across the territories and the Republican Party gained prominence in the territories of the north and west.
dred scott decision
the decision made slavery legal in all us territories that were not yet states
Yes. Congress could NOT tell territories or states not to have slaves.
Utah and New Mexico
Utah and New Mexico
"Bleeding Kansas"
The decision made slavery legal in all U.S. territories that were not yet states.
No but the supreme court made it invalid with the Dred Scot decision
kansas and nebraska
Plantation owners were outraged that slavery had been outlawed in the territories. People in the territories were angry that a new political party had been established. Many Americans disagreed with the Supreme Court decision to limit slavery in the territories. Opposing forces clashed because they disagreed about popular sovereignty and slavery.
compromise of 1850
The Republican Party and the Quakers were the leading opponents of expanding slavery into the new territories.