This empire has been called the Byzantine Empire by historians, not the Romans themselves, who only had one term: Roman Empire. The Roman Empire did not split. What happened was that the western part of the empire fell under the weight of the Germanic invasions, while the east was not touched by these invasions and continued to exist until 1543.
As mentioned, the Romans only had one term: Roman Empire. All other terms, Western Roman Empire, Eastern Roman Empire and Byzantine Empire have been coined by historians.
The terms Western and Eastern Roman Empire refer to the fact that emperor Diocletian created a co-emperorship with an emperor in the west and one in the east. This was done to improve the defence of the vast frontiers of the empire which had been under frequent attack in Western Europe, Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Milan became the imperial capital in the west and Nicomedia (in northwestern Turkey) the imperial capital in the east (Constantine I then moved it to Constantinople). These cities were closer to the troubled frontiers than Rome. Rome became only the nominal capital of the whole empire. Diocletian made it clear that there was only one empire.
Byzantine Empire is the term used by historians to indicate the Eastern Roman Empire after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. It is used with reference to the fact that when this empire lost most of its non-Greek territories it became centred on Greece and Greek in character. Greek replaced Latin as the official language of this empire in 620. This was only about 150 years after the fall of the west. The word Byzantine is derived from Byzantium the name of an originally Greek city before it was redeveloped and called Constantinople.
No. Diocletian split the Roman Empire.
Constantine didn't split the Roman Empire. It was Diocletian, and he divided the empire into western and eastern halves.
Diocletian split the empire into eastern and western halves in order to make governing easier.
eastern and western
No, it was a man named Diocletian.
Diocletian.Diocletian.Diocletian.Diocletian.Diocletian.Diocletian.Diocletian.Diocletian.Diocletian.
Diocletian took the throne in 284CE. One of his first orders was to split the Roman Empire into two parts, the Eastern and the Western Roman Empire. He kept the Eastern part and gave the Western part to his friend Maximian.
There has never been a Roman emperor who was split in two. If you mean the Roman empire, that too, was never split. The terms Western and Eastern regarding the Roman empire was/is a devise used by historians in their writings so that their readers are able to understand them more clearly. When the western part of the empire fell, the empire continued despite the loss of its western territories. The closest that the empire ever came to being "split" was when Diocletian divided it into four areas with his two Caesars and two Augusti, which were supposed to make the vast Roman territory easier to rule.
Constantine split the Roman Empire into the Holy Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. It should be noted however that the emperor Diocletian (284-305 AD ) made this easier as he was the first to divide the empire into two parts, a western and eastern empire to be ruled separately. The emperors who followed Constantine, Julian and Theodosius I, made permanent the division of the Roman Empire into an eastern and western half.
The Roman Empire split into two pieces, the Western Empire whose capitol was still in Rome, and the Eastern with its capitol in Constantinople, modern Istanbul.
The Roman Empire split into the Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire primarily due to administrative and logistical challenges in governing its vast territories. By the late 3rd century AD, Emperor Diocletian enacted reforms that divided the empire into smaller, more manageable regions, a process further solidified by Constantine the Great, who established Constantinople as the capital of the Eastern Empire. This division allowed for more localized governance but ultimately led to divergent political, cultural, and economic developments, culminating in the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 AD while the Eastern Empire, or Byzantine Empire, continued for nearly another thousand years.
Using the conventional date for the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire, it would be 81 years. The Roman Empire split into two parts after the death of the emperor Theodosius in 395. This was not due to a decision to split the empire. It was due to circumstances. Theodosius designated his two sons as co-emperors, with Honorius in charge in the west and Arcadius in charge in the east. Previously, co-emperorships did not involve a split of the empire. However, the co-emperors were young and inexperienced and allowed men at their courts to conspire against each other's courts. Moreover, 11 years later there were the invasions by the Germanic peoples which precipitated the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. Historians use 476 as a conventional date for the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. In this year the last emperor in the west, Romulus Augustus, was deposed.