answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Some opposition to the expansion of nuclear power plants in the US is generated by those who produce power by other means such as coal, oil, and gas. But the major opposition comes from the part of the population that has a somewhat exaggerated fear of nuclear power plants. Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima loom large as nuclear disasters. All three situations were the result of poor design and construction.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What explains the position of those who oppose expanding nuclear power plants in the US?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why do some people oppose plans by the US department of energy to construct a nuclear waste storage facility in Nevada?

Mainly I think these are people who oppose anything to do with nuclear power


What is a person lying in the anatomical position said to be?

He is in a supine position. The oppose is the prone position.


Why do environmentalists oppose the operation of a nuclear power plant?

Because its is inexpensive and clean power


Why do most people oppose the operation of the nuclear power plant?

nobody has asked me. i don't.


Why do many environmentalists oppose the operation of a nuclear power plant?

because thats all thank you


Is Nuclear Energy technology widely accepted today?

Yes, most advanced countries are either building nuclear or considering it, but there are always groups who oppose it as well, so it depends what you mean by 'widely'


Is nuclear energy good for the enviornment?

It is a ... mixed blessing. It won't produce carbon dioxide, and thus it should reduce global heating. However, there is currently no safe way to get rid of the nuclear wastes, which are also quite dangerous. I believe ecologists normally oppose nuclear energy, for this reason.It is a ... mixed blessing. It won't produce carbon dioxide, and thus it should reduce global heating. However, there is currently no safe way to get rid of the nuclear wastes, which are also quite dangerous. I believe ecologists normally oppose nuclear energy, for this reason.It is a ... mixed blessing. It won't produce carbon dioxide, and thus it should reduce global heating. However, there is currently no safe way to get rid of the nuclear wastes, which are also quite dangerous. I believe ecologists normally oppose nuclear energy, for this reason.It is a ... mixed blessing. It won't produce carbon dioxide, and thus it should reduce global heating. However, there is currently no safe way to get rid of the nuclear wastes, which are also quite dangerous. I believe ecologists normally oppose nuclear energy, for this reason.


Why did the Federalists oppose the purchase of Louisana?

They opposed this fearing that the new states in the west would become Jeffersonian and the rapidly expanding frontier would 'decivilize' the entire nation.


Why aren't there more nuclear power plants?

The reason is that there are many people around the world who are uneducated in the nuclear power field and therefore still assume the stereotypical nuclear meltdown or mutations will occur and as such, oppose their construction vehemently. Also, it is quite expensive to develop and build such plants.


What countries wanted to oppose communism?

The countries united in NATO. (They did so with the help of nuclear weapons because communist countries had surplus in conventional weapons.)


How the effects of nuclear charge and the increasing number of core electrons in an atom oppose each other?

The increasing number of core electrons serve to "shield" the outer electrons from the positive charges in the nucleus. Thus, the effective nuclear charge (Zeff) is reduced.


Why does Mexico oppose nuclear weapons?

It is a dangerous technology that could wipe out the majority of the world's population in a couple of hours. Besides, Mexico does not have any enemies, thus by banning nuclear weapons on its soil, Mexico has a moral advantage in case it is attacked by a nuclear power (i.e. it would be considered an atrocity, forcing many nations to side up towards Mexico in case of a nuclear attack).