answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The factor used to decide whether an area could be open to slavery under the Missouri Compromise was its geographical location. This compromise established a line at latitude 36°30' where slavery would be permitted south of the line and prohibited north of it, with the exception of Missouri.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

4d ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What factor was used to decide whether or not an area could be open to slavery according to the Missouri compromise?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

What was the law that allowed voters to choose whether to allow slavery?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 allowed voters in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether to allow slavery through popular sovereignty. This overturned the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which prohibited slavery in territories north of a certain latitude.


Missouri's application for statehood in 1819 raised the issue of whether slavery?

Missouri's application for statehood in 1819 raised the issue of whether slavery should be allowed in the new state, leading to fierce debates in Congress about the balance of power between free and slave states. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 emerged as a temporary resolution, allowing Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state while Maine entered as a free state, and prohibiting slavery in the unorganized territories north of the 36°30’ parallel.


What did the kansas-nebraska act allow the settlers of territories regarding slavery?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed settlers in those territories to decide whether or not to permit slavery through popular sovereignty, overturning the Missouri Compromise's restriction on slavery in certain territories. This led to violent conflicts between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers in Kansas, known as "Bleeding Kansas."


How did the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 deal with the issue slavery?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to determine whether they would allow slavery based on popular sovereignty. This contradicted the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had prohibited slavery in this region. The Act ultimately led to violent clashes between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces in Kansas, known as "Bleeding Kansas."


What effect did the Kansas-Nebraska act 1854 have on the conflict over slavery?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 heightened tensions over slavery by allowing settlers to determine whether slavery would be allowed in those territories, effectively overturning the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This led to violent clashes between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in Kansas, known as "Bleeding Kansas," and further polarized the nation on the issue of slavery.

Related questions

Where did slavery exist in the US in 1820?

In 1820, politicians debated the question of whether slavery would be legal in the western territories. The Missouri Compromise permitted slavery in the new state of Missouri and the Arkansas Territory but it was barred everywhere west and north of Missouri.


What act in essence repealed the Missouri Compromise by allowing popular sovereignty in territories that had been legally closed to slavery?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 essentially repealed the Missouri Compromise (1820) by allowing new states to determine whether slavery would be allowed there or not.


What about slavery above north of the line of Missouri compromise?

North of that line, slavery was illegal in all the territories of the Louisiana Purchase, according to the Missouri Compromise. The acquisition of the new territories from Mexico required a new Compromise (1850) and this one did not work. Stephen Douglas of Illinois proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which allowed the people of each state to vote whether to be slave or free. The voting in Kansas caused bloodshed, and it was not tried again. But the imminent Civil War would spell the end of slavery throughout the USAin any case.


Why did the Missouri compromises not prevent the US Civil War?

Both the Missouri compromises gave the US more time to consider the issue of slavery and whether slavery would be allowed in the new US territories. There is no direct linkage to the last Missouri compromise of 1850 and the US Civil War.


What did the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 do?

both the Missouri compromise of 1820 and the compromise of 1850 settled conflicts between the north and the south over


How did the kansas nebraska changed The Missouri Compromise?

It changed the balance of power which had previously existed by allowing those territories popular sovereignty to decide whether to allow slavery or not for themselves.


The act that ended the Missouri Compromise's restriction on slavery was the?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, proposed by Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois, in effect repealed the Missouri Compromise because it allowed the settlers in these two areas to decide whether or not to allow slavery. Since these territories were located north Missouri, they gave southern slaveholders an opportunity that had been closed to them since 1820.


What law was replaced by allowing popular sovereignty?

retained the power to replace the legislative with a new legislative


How did the settlement of the west increase tension between the north and the south?

The Settlement, The Missouri Compromise, caused them, to argue over whether new states would permit slavery.


What were the issues with the Missouri Compromise?

whether or not to become a free state


When did the congress pass the act of Kansas-Nebraska?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed in 1854. It repealed the original decision of the Missouri Compromise. It allowed states to vote whether or not to allow slavery.


Where did the Compromise Of 1850 Decided Whether They Wanted Slavery?

utah and mexico