answersLogoWhite

0

The GNU General Public License was originally written by Richard Stallman for the GNU mass-collaboration software project. Like Creative Commons and other copyleft systems, it is a broad license that allows users to freely use, copy, and modify software.

Copyright automatically gives the creator of a sufficiently creative work, including the author of computer code, the exclusive right to copy, alter, distribute, or perform/display the work, or authorize others to do so. It's the automatic aspect that unintentionally makes it awkward for creators wishing to freely share their works, but it's the right to authorize others that makes these extremely broad licenses viable: the GPL, Creative Commons, etc. work alongside copyright.

Licenses such as the GPL encourage sharing and collaboration by allowing users to distribute and modify programs without constantly having to seek additional permission from the copyright holder, and they let the copyright holders spend time on new projects instead of constantly responding to licensing requests.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What do the abbreviations GNU GPL stand for?

The abbreviation GNU stands for 'Gnu's Not Unix' in computing. And the abbreviation GPL stands for 'General Public License' also in computing. Of course, there are could be other abbreviations too.


What is the difference between GNU and GPL?

one of them has gNU and the other has gPL!!!! The GNU is the Lesser General Public Licence or LGPL (formerly the GNU Library General Public Licence). The main difference between them is that the LGP lets work to be linked to a non-(L)GPLed programme whether it is free software or proprietary software.


What type of license does the KDE currently use?

Most of KDE is available under the GNU GPL. Some programs, such as Kate / KWrite are available under the GNU LGPL.


Full form of GPL?

GNU Public License. "GNU" in turn is a recursive acronym standing for "GNUs Not Unix."


Is VisualBoy Advance free?

Yes. VisualBoy Advance is free to download, use, and modify under the terms of the GNU GPL.


Explain open source in relation to the GNU GPL?

Open source means that the source code is available free of charge. That does not mean however that you have any other rights in connection to it. GNU GPL insures that a software is "Free" (as in Freedom), making sure that users not only have the right to see the source code, but modify it in any way they like it as long as they license the modifications under the GPL, too. See the link to Free Software vs. Open Source for more details.


How many kinds of copyright tags CC INC GNU etc are there and what are their meanings?

12


What does the GNU general public license require software developers to do when modifying Linux versions?

GNU doesn't regulate anything. The GPL, on the other hand, requires that if you redistribute Linux with your modifications, that you make the source code of your modifications available as well. Keep in mind this only applied to DISTRIBUTION. In-house/personal-use stuff you are literally unrestricted and can even keep modifications to yourself. To make this a little less confusing, consider this: 1. Distributor X makes Y modification to Linux. 2. X sends out Linux with Y modification and has to make Y available openly without restriction. 3. End user Z gets Linux with Y. 4. Z modifies Linux with Y with further modification W. 5. Because Z is not sharing Linux with modifications Y and W, he doesn't have to share W at all. A more real world example: 1. nVidia makes an excellent proprietary driver for their video cards on Linux. 2. Because the driver is proprietary, this driver cannot be included with the kernel tree itself. 3. Instead, the end user typically has Linux installed with a kernel and has to download and install the driver themselves, typically over their distribution's repositories. There used to be a debate about whether this driver violates the GPL anyway over "derived works" clauses, though even the FSF (Responsible for the GPL and its terms.) has pretty much held there is no such violation. Further, the GPL, being a license and not a law, cannot take away the rights of the OWNER of the copyright. If I am the sole owner of code I have licensed under the GPL, the GPL can't stop me at all from relicensing the whole shebang under a proprietary commercial license. Some companies, such as Canonical, even have "copyright reassignment" agreements with contributors that legally transfers copyright from the modder to Canonical and it won't violate the GPL, however a lot of people find this shady and against the spirit of free software. Still, because of this, if you're sole copyright holder and want to include proprietary code with your work, you won't be able to use the GPL without violating it, though technically a copyright holder cannot violate their own copyright. I am unsure if the GPL can stop a copyright holder from including proprietary software of their own creation directly into GPL code of their own creation, but it would definitely stop anyone else from redistributing the whole package themselves unless they remove the proprietary parts.


Where can one get a hold of a opensta?

You can get the OpenSTA Tools Software online from the Sourceforge website. OpenSTA tools are free open source software provided under the GNU GPL license.


What is the most common license used for software distribution?

The most common license used for software distribution is the open-source license, such as the GNU General Public License (GPL) or the MIT License.


What is an advantage of GPL license?

One advantage of the GNU General Public License (GPL) is that it ensures software freedom by allowing users to run, modify, and distribute the software. This fosters a collaborative environment where developers can build upon each other's work, leading to innovation and improvement. Additionally, any derivative works must also be distributed under the same GPL terms, which helps maintain the software's freedom for future users.


Is free software that is available with few licensing and copyright restrictions?

Yes, free software typically comes with minimal licensing and copyright restrictions, allowing users to run, modify, and distribute the software freely. These licenses, such as the GNU General Public License (GPL) or the MIT License, promote collaboration and sharing while ensuring that the software remains accessible to all. However, it's essential to read and understand the specific terms of each license, as they can vary in their requirements and permissions.