There are over 4 million Palestinians in the Middle East. This does not even count the number of Palestinian Expatriates in Europe, the USA, Canada, and a number of other nations. Just as there are many people in different walks of life there are many opinions. A rough sketch of these include:
1) The Conflict is Wasteful & Disastrous: This general vein is more common among Expatriates than Camp Members (for wont of a better term). The general idea here is that although in an ideal world Palestine should occupy more land, have a better government, so forth and so on, refugees should settle in the West Bank and Gaza for the time being and just stop fighting long enough to reach a diplomatic solution (and compensation) with Israel.
2) We Should Never Give In: This general vein is more common among Camp Members than Expatriates. Either they believe that an acceptance either (or in many cases all three) Israeli legitimacy or 1949 borders or financial compensation, would not legitimate their suffering without their homes, land, and generally horrible lives. They believe that those who caused and profit from their suffering (namely Israelis) should be stopped from profiting and in some cases should be criminally indicted or punished.
3) Arab States Should Be More Generous: This opinion is certainly in the minority, but a small group of Camp Members typically argue that they are already inside the borders of (Arab country name) and until a peaceable solution is worked out, they should be able to live in (Arab country name) and establish their livelihoods outside of the camps.
There has not been a state of Palestine since the mandate ended in 1948.
That depends entirely on your perspective of the situation. There is the opinion that Israel has been the unwitting recipient of conflict since its inception and that all it wants is for the conflict to cease. There is of course the even more fatuous claim that every shred of violence in the Middle East is traceable back to Israel. What is clear is that while Israel has certainly had a strong hand in the conflicts it participated in, it takes two to tango.
In art, "perspective" is the viewpoint of the artist and the audience. Some art is made from an overhead perspective, such as a pictorial survey of a city; other art is made from a ground-level perspective or from a distance. There are also ways to distort the perspective and to deliberately incorporate several different perspectives into one piece.
Euro-centric thinking to Latin America in Central America , wet-pack ? (some sort anti immigrant law - policy to drive them back) < 1971, what else ? But I suppose they have some collective bargaining.
Patrick Henry had the give me liberty or give me death perspective...uhhh alex had a diff perspective i guess lol
conflict perspective
The conflict perspective views family and marriage as social structures that perpetuate inequality and serve the interests of those in power. It emphasizes how relationships within families can be marked by power struggles and exploitation, with some family members benefiting more than others. Overall, the conflict perspective argues that family and marriage can contribute to maintaining societal inequalities.
a grass
conflict perspective
The conflict and consensus perspective on education tends to view in school and intuition that perpetuate.
Conflict Perspective
The conflict and consensus perspective on education tends to view in school and intuition that perpetuate.
Inflexibility and a win-lose perspective typically characterize a competitive or adversarial conflict style. This approach focuses on individual goals and outcomes, often at the expense of cooperation and collaboration with others. It can lead to escalated tensions and difficulties in finding mutually beneficial solutions.
The conflict perspective emphasizes the unequal distribution of power and resources in society, leading to social conflicts between different groups with competing interests. It views society as a system built on inequality and focuses on how this inequality drives social change through power struggles and resistance.
Revisionist or conflict perspective in historiography means that historical perspectives change over time and are dependent on biases of the writer.
A. Interactionist perspective. This perspective focuses on how individuals interact with one another in specific social situations, making it suitable for studying behaviors like "slugging," where individuals form informal carpooling networks for commuting.
The neo-conflict perspective refers to a new clash between two people or groups. It can also be defined as the opposition of two groups simultaneously.