Higher the frequency, higher the losses.
There are no applications for losses, that's why they are called 'losses'!
Need for modulation: 1. Length of the antenna for a transmitter is inversly proportional to the frequency of the signal to be transmitted. So we try shift the frequency of the singal for the transmission to higher frequencies. 2. Every transmission of signal in a bandwidth is assigned with a particular frequency which is attained by modulating the signal with the carrier frequency. Different modulation techniques are implemented according to the requirements and compatibilities
Using a higher voltage reduces power losses during transmission.
Much higher.
The no load losses are the losses caused by energizing the transformer. These are constant losses, regardless of loading. This in effect tells you the efficiency of the transformer. (Power in) - (no load losses) = (Power out)
There are losses in d.c. transmission lines, due to their resistance. But there are no reactive losses. So, d.c. transmission lines have less losses in comparison to an equivalent a.c. transmission line.
Due to corona effect virtually conductor size is increase and therefor resistance in transmission line is decreases.so I2R losses will decreases...
D.C. high-voltage transmission is used over long distances as they have less losses (e.g. undersea cables, because of the proximity of the individual cores have high capacitive losses with a.c.), and there are no frequency synchronisation problems when these are used as d.c. 'links' between countries (e.g. UK/France).
There are no applications for losses, that's why they are called 'losses'!
separation of core losses are necessary to determine core losses at diffrent frequency.........
TRANSMISSION LINE LOSSES
Need for modulation: 1. Length of the antenna for a transmitter is inversly proportional to the frequency of the signal to be transmitted. So we try shift the frequency of the singal for the transmission to higher frequencies. 2. Every transmission of signal in a bandwidth is assigned with a particular frequency which is attained by modulating the signal with the carrier frequency. Different modulation techniques are implemented according to the requirements and compatibilities
failure of generation and cause losses
alternating current is generally instantaneous in nature and even in transmission lines it is easy to transmit with less losses when compared to dc as because it possess frequency where as dc do not have
IN DC FOR LOW VOLTAGE HIGH DENSITY OF CURRENT WILL BE THERE SO WE CAN NOT USE THIS FOR BEST PRACTICE FOR TRANSMISSION & ALSO BECOS OF HIGH CURRENT TRANSMISSION LOSSES ARE VERY HIGH ( I2XR) LOSSES, TRANSMISSIN EQUIPMENT FOR DC ARE HIGH COSTIN DC FOR LOW VOLTAGE HIGH DENSITY OF CURRENT WILL BE THERE SO WE CAN NOT USE THIS FOR BEST PRACTICE FOR TRANSMISSION & ALSO BECOS OF HIGH CURRENT TRANSMISSION LOSSES ARE VERY HIGH ( I2XR) LOSSES, TRANSMISSIN EQUIPMENT FOR DC ARE HIGH COSTAnswerThe main reason is that we cannot use transformers to easily and efficiently change the magnitude of DC voltages, and the ability to change voltages is essential for electricity distribution. However, having said that, very high-voltage transmission over exceptionally long distances is often done using DC. This is because DC losses are far lower than AC losses.
The frequency of 50 Hertz (or 60 Hertz in other countries) was selected to reduce inductive power losses caused by long distance power line transmission and still enable alternating current to be converted to various voltages and currents using moderate sized transformers at the point of power use. The higher the power frequency the higher the inductive losses over a length of power transmission line. For this reason frequencies higher than 60 Hertz are avoided. Where possible electrical power transmission over long distances these days is accomplished with high voltage direct current, which is converted to alternating current near the usage areas.
Yes, controlling frequency and severity of losses reduces overall loss.