Passive resistance or non-violent resistance is what Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. used. Dr. King was influenced by Ghandi.
Civil disobedience. Violence. Bombings
NO BITCHESS nope
NO BITCHESS nope
People can get hurt or killed. People may be breaking the law by engaging in violence. People can make their point without resorting to violence. Violence can often undermine a protest as the protesters will be accused of being bad people and so their protest is not valid. It gives those they are protesting against something to use against the protesters. So for these and other reasons there should not be violence at protests.
The justification for John Brown's use of violence to protest slavery is a complex and contentious issue. Some argue that his actions were a necessary response to the extreme brutality and inhumanity of slavery, highlighting the urgency for abolition. Others contend that violence only perpetuated conflict and undermined the moral high ground of the anti-slavery movement. Ultimately, whether one sees Brown's actions as justified depends on their views about the efficacy and morality of violence in the pursuit of social justice.
violent protest is like the suffragettes they used violence to get what they wanted and nonviolent is where you use powers of persuasion to get your way and not to use violence.
The protest movement can be split into two distinct groups, the Moral Force chartists and the Physical Force chartists. These groups attempted to force reform in distinctively different ways. The Moral Force chartists intended peaceful protest, the Physical force chartists, as the name suggests, intended to force change through use of physical force and violence. Moral Force chartists- protested peacefully Physical Force chartists- protested violently
he led non violence protests
While John Brown's passion and commitment to ending slavery are commendable, his use of violence can be seen as morally questionable. While some argue that violence was necessary to provoke change, others believe that non-violent methods could have been more effective in achieving the same goal. Overall, Brown's actions remain a point of controversy in the discussion of the abolitionist movement.
Physical violence during protests can lead to injuries, property damage, and loss of life, detracting from the intended message of the protest. It can also alienate potential supporters and give authorities a reason to use force in response. In extreme cases, violence may escalate the situation and shift the focus away from the original cause of the protest.
Instead of violence, you could use communication, negotiation, empathy, and conflict resolution strategies to address conflicts and issues. These alternatives can help promote understanding, build trust, and find peaceful resolutions.
worldwide attention to the Indian independence movement.