0
What is the result when you cut government spending on social programs and lower income taxes?
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is one major result of requiring middle-income countries to make payments on their debts to lending agencies?
They make spending cuts in programs that were intended to help the poor, creating poverty in their country
How can the government encourage more spending?
Firstly, the Aggregate Demand consists of [ C + I + G +(X-M) ]. Government spending being one of the component of AD will affect the GDP. In this case, higher AD will boost the national income by a multiple amount through the multiplier effect.Next, government spending can be in the form of education, training, subsidies etc. This definitely will benefit the society in terms of lower price (Subsidies), able to fetch higher factor income in future (Education), increased productivity (Training) and much more! In a nutshell, the initial increase in G will in turn result in increased C , I and even X!
How can government spending trigger a chain of events that helps to improve the economy?
This theory comes from John Maynard Keynes's theories on the economy. High government spending (AKA running a budget deficit) means that there is an increased demand in the market for business output, which will result in increased employment, which will result in higher incomes, which will result in increased consumer spending, which well then result in even more demand. This practice is theoretically most useful to bring an economy out of a recession and reverse high unemployment.
Does reducing government spending improve or exacerbate an ailing economy?
It may temporarily improve the government's bottom line, but because government spending is such a large part of a country's economy, the net result is a drastic negative impact on the economy where entire industries (such a defense contractors) may cease to exist.
Why government want to have low unemployment and low rate of inflation?
Lower unemployment means there are more people with incomes this means the government will receive more income tax. Furthermore there are less people dependent on the government such as benefits therefore the government is spending less or they can use that money for healthcare, education or policing. More families with a higher income will result in higher consumption this means more money from VAT. High inflation simply means an increase in price over a period of time, the government wants to keep inflation down as it means prices will not be ridiculously high.
Why the government spending multiplier is different form the tax multiplier?
The government spending multiplier is different form the tax multiplier from the top of my head is because the government spending total effect ripples off. That is if government spending increase then the total income increases. When total income increase, consumption increases, when consumption increases total income increases further (as consumption is a factor of total income), and this pattern is carried forward. This is the the multiplier effect, such that an increase in government spending's final impact on income is much bigger than its initial increase. The tax multiplier on the other hand, has a much smaller effect than government spending. This is because tax is only a portion of the consumer income. That is, if there is a tax cut, consumers only save a fractional amount (specifically 1-MPC) of a tax cut. As a result of the smaller boost in spending form ma tax cut, the ripples/multiplier effect of a tax cut is much less than an increase in government spending.
What is one major result of requiring middle-income countries to make payments on their debts to lending agencies?
They make spending cuts in programs that were intended to help the poor, creating poverty in their country
What was one result of the Democratic Party?
Social programs, otherwise known as welfare or income redistribution, are the main result of the Democratic party. They draw most of their votes from low income people and from people who work with or sympathize with them. When they get control, these programs are the result.
Where can one find disposable income?
Disposable income is defined to be income that is available for spending and saving after all taxes have been accounted for. Therefore, disposable income is a result of any income in a general sense. One needs to have a source of income such as a job to have more disposable income.
How can the government encourage more spending?
Firstly, the Aggregate Demand consists of [ C + I + G +(X-M) ]. Government spending being one of the component of AD will affect the GDP. In this case, higher AD will boost the national income by a multiple amount through the multiplier effect.Next, government spending can be in the form of education, training, subsidies etc. This definitely will benefit the society in terms of lower price (Subsidies), able to fetch higher factor income in future (Education), increased productivity (Training) and much more! In a nutshell, the initial increase in G will in turn result in increased C , I and even X!
How can government spending trigger a chain of events that helps to improve the economy?
This theory comes from John Maynard Keynes's theories on the economy. High government spending (AKA running a budget deficit) means that there is an increased demand in the market for business output, which will result in increased employment, which will result in higher incomes, which will result in increased consumer spending, which well then result in even more demand. This practice is theoretically most useful to bring an economy out of a recession and reverse high unemployment.
What type of government spending is often the result of fiscal policy?
All government spending is ultimately the result of fiscal policy. Fiscal policy is another way of saying "how government spends money it raises through taxation to influence the economy". A government that believes it should not play a large part in driving economic demand through spending (a 'tight' fiscal policy) would typically raise and spend less than a government pursuing a 'loose' fiscal policy. If you count basic state expenditure on social security and healthcare as being non-negotiable then you might typically see a government engaged in discretionary spending such as large infrastructure projects as a result of fiscal policy (i.e. to directly employ the unemployed as workers and boost the economy). These kinds of discretionary spending most often result from fiscal policy. You may also want to explore the related links.
If a person receives a paycheck for 600 and the government takes 200 in income taxes it is a result of which amendment?
sixteenth
Does reducing government spending improve or exacerbate an ailing economy?
It may temporarily improve the government's bottom line, but because government spending is such a large part of a country's economy, the net result is a drastic negative impact on the economy where entire industries (such a defense contractors) may cease to exist.
Can a government spending multiplier be a value of less than 1?
Quite simply, no. The Spending multiplier, even on government spending, will always have a value of greater than one. It really is self-evident; for that money to be subjected to a multiplier, it must be circulating multiple times, therefore the first circulation (the initial spending) would result in a multiplier of one, and subsequent spends would increase the multiplier further
What was the result of Hoover's plan to get local governments to increase public works spending?
Local financial reserves were exhausted An increase in sales taxes An elimination of unemployment relief programs
How does deficit financing lead to public debt?
The federal government practiced deficit financing. That is, it spent more than it took in each year and borrowed to make up the difference. The government relied on deficit financing to deal with the Depression of the 1930s, to raise money for WW2, and to fund wars and social programs over the next several decades. In fact, the government's books did not show a surplus (more income than spending) in any year from 1969 to 1998. As a result, the public debt rose year to year to more than $5.5 trillion at the beginning of fiscal year 1999.
