0
What law was declared null and void because of the Dred Scott decision?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
The Missouri Compromise of 1820, banning slavery North of the parallel 36.30.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was declared null and void by the Dred Scott decision. This ruling by the Supreme Court held that Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories, effectively invalidating the Missouri Compromise's restriction on slavery in the northern territories.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was the Dred Scott and Dred Scott decision about?
The Dred Scott case was a landmark Supreme Court decision in 1857 that ruled African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered U.S. citizens and thus had no standing to sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, sparking further tensions over the issue of slavery in the United States.
Who was the slave who sued for his freedom in the Supreme Court was?
Dred Scott
What did the Supreme Court rule in the Dred Scott case?
The ruling in the Dred Scott case allowed slave owners to take their slaves with them into the Western territories of the United States.
What did the dred Scott decision say about dred?
The Dred Scott decision, handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1857, ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered U.S. citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, stating that Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories.
How did the south feel about the dred Scott decision?
The South generally supported the Dred Scott decision because it upheld the rights of slaveowners to take their slaves into any territory. They saw it as a victory for states' rights and slaveholding interests.
What decision declared that slaves could not be taken from their masters?
The Dred Scott decision
Why did the Dred Scott decision alarm Northerners?
The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.
Why was part of the nation was upset over the Dred Scott decision?
The North was upset because the decision declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. - Novanet
Why were republicans angered by the dred Scott V. Sandford decision?
Because it declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union.
What best summarizes why part of the nation was upset of the dred Scott decision?
The North was upset because the decision declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. - Novanet
What summarizes why part of the nation was upset over the dred Scott decision?
The North was upset because the decision declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. - Novanet
Which of these was not a result of the Dred Scott U.S. supreme court decision?
The Supreme Court declared Scott was a free man
What best summarize why part of the nation was upset over the Dred Scott decision?
The North was upset because the decision declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. - Novanet
What decision declared the Missouri compromise unconstitutional?
The admission of California to the Union - it was too big to be accommodated according to the terms of that compromise.
As a result of the Dred Scott decision the was declared unconstitutional.?
i dont give a s**t kk
Which group of people supported the Dred Scott Decision?
The South was delighted with this decision - it declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union.
How did the northerners and southerners react to the Dred Scott decision?
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
