0
Nothing specific led to the reign of the five good emperors. They were men who succeeded the imperial title.
The term the 'five good emperors' was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. The term is the fruit of the ideological views and not necessarily a fair comparison with their predecessors. For example, he excluded Titus from the term even though he considered him a good emperor. He said that these emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. He mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81)) Nerva (96-98 AD), Trajan (98-117), Hadrian (117-138), Antoninus Pius (138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors because Titus was the son of the emperor Vespasian, while the other five men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor). Machiavelli thought that they were good rulers because they did not inherit the throne by birth. They were benign rulers, lived good lives pursued moderate policies, ruled wisely, allowed a lot of freedom and earned the goodwill of the people. He also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started again. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all who were good succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.'
The famous 18th century historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom."
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What conditions led to the reign of terror?
Factionalism between the Girondins and the Jacobins led to the reign of terror.
Was commodus a good or bad emperor?
There were five good emperors (a term which was coined by Machiavelli and is still used). They were: Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius. Although Commodus was Marcus Aurelius' son and chosen heir, he is not considered one of the good emperors. He had little interest in state administration and delegated the running of the state to his favourites. He preferred to live outside Rome, spending his time hunting. His bad rule led to several conspiracies, his assassination and the so-called Year of the Five Emperors. In this year five men fought each other to become emperors. Four of them were deposed soon after usurping the tile. The last one, Septimius Severus, managed to hold on to power. Commodus' rule was described by an ancient historian as the descent "from a kingdom of gold to one of rust and iron."
What was the Reign of Terror used for?
led to thousands of executions by the guillotine.
Was King Edward the confessor a good king or bad king?
His reign is known for its peaceful nature. But his succession issue led the the invasion of the Normans in 1066.
What are five key events that led to the statehood?
What are the five key events that led to Indians statehood
Who led the Romans during the Pax Romana?
The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.
What was the period of bad ramon emperors?
There was not a period of bad Roman emperors. There was a period of good emperors. The term the 'five good emperors' was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. He said that these emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. He mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81)) Nerva (ruled 96-98 AD), Trajan (ruled 98-117), Hadrian (ruled 117-138), Antoninus Pius (ruled 138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (ruled 161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors because these men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor) and he thought that this was why they were good rulers. They were good rulers, lived good lives and earned the goodwill of the people. Machiavelli also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started and the ruin of the empire commenced. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad. All were good who succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.' This is a bit on an extreme view as there were also good emperors after the "five good emperors." Still, the bad rule of Commodus (who succeeded Marcus Aurelius) led to the end of the period of relative political stability in the empire which historians have called Pax Romana (roman peace). The famous historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom."
Was the reign of terror led by foreigners who invaded France?
The Reign of Terror was a response to the instability in France. No is was not led by invaders.
What conditions led to the reign of terror?
Factionalism between the Girondins and the Jacobins led to the reign of terror.
Maximilien Robespierre led France during which phase of the Revolution?
The Reign of Terror.
Which emperors actions led to the beginning of the byzantine empire?
Diocletian
What rebellion led to the Reign of Terror?
The French Revolution.
What led to the reign of terror?
louis XVI's death
Was Cleopatra a good leader?
Looking back on her reign one would have to say that Cleopatra was not a good leader. Her avarice and ambition led to the destruction of her dynasty and the fall of her country.
Was commodus a good or bad emperor?
There were five good emperors (a term which was coined by Machiavelli and is still used). They were: Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius. Although Commodus was Marcus Aurelius' son and chosen heir, he is not considered one of the good emperors. He had little interest in state administration and delegated the running of the state to his favourites. He preferred to live outside Rome, spending his time hunting. His bad rule led to several conspiracies, his assassination and the so-called Year of the Five Emperors. In this year five men fought each other to become emperors. Four of them were deposed soon after usurping the tile. The last one, Septimius Severus, managed to hold on to power. Commodus' rule was described by an ancient historian as the descent "from a kingdom of gold to one of rust and iron."
Who led the Regine of terror?
Maximilien Robespierre led the reign of terror during the French revolution.
Who was the French lawyer who presided over the Reign of Terror?
Maximilian Robespierre led it until he was guillotined, signifying the end of the "Reign"
