Want this question answered?
No. The official religion of the Safavid Empire was Shiite Islam. They were also quite zealous rulers, forcibly converting many to Shiite Islam.
Safavid rulers were shiites.
Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law Ali.
The Ottoman Empire's government was consistently tolerant. The Mughal Empire's government waxed and waned between tolerance under some rulers and intolerance under others. The Safavid Empire was consistently intolerant.
Not by a long shot. The rulers of the Ottoman Empire were the Sultan, in political matters, and the Caliph, in spiritual matters. Shiites (shia) are a sect of Islam vigorously opposed by the Ottoman Empire and were often seen as a fifth column with loyalties to the Ottoman Empire's rival: the Safavid Persian Empire.
One of the biggest problems for the rulers of the Ottoman Empire in the late 1700s was the rise of internal rebellions and separatist movements. As the empire began to decline, various regions and ethnic groups within the empire sought to assert their independence. This led to conflicts and the eventual fragmentation of the empire.
ThEy PrAcTiCeD mEdIcINe... fOr ThE mUsLiMs bY: mIsS mArIi
the answer is B. Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr whereas Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his own son-in-law Ali.
The abbasids were rulers of the Islamic Empire back in the 700s to 1200s.
Zoroastrianism was the ancient pre-Islamic religion of Iran. The Zoroastrian festival of Nauroz was favored by the Safavid rulers of Iran. Moreover, celebrating this festival involves, a great deal of expenditure. Because of this reason Aurangzeb discontinued it.
first shah ismailfirst shah tahmasbsecond shah ismailmuhammad khoda bandehfirst shah AbbsShah SafiSECOND SHAH Abbasshah Soleimanshah soltan Hosseinsecond shah tahmasbthird shah abbas
The Edyptian rulers used there absoulte power