This is the kind of question that whole learned books are being written about and which would require an answer dealing with countless aspects of Russian life and mind.
A very brief and not all-too-scientific answer would be that is has been negligible. Basically Communism in Russia built on a culture dating back to the earliest days of Russian culture, where there had always been autocrats with unlimited power ruling over a people that were largely peasants and serfs with a very fatalistic outlook on life.
Communism replaced an autocratic Tsar by autocratic leaders like Stalin and replaced the priviliged nobility with priviliged Party Members; all this while the Tsar's Secret Service and riot troops changed in name only. Well, with the difference that the Tsarist Secret Service was sometimes charmingly inept while the Communist Secret Service was ruthlessly efficient. And banishment to Siberia in Tsarist times was a walk in the park compared with living conditions in Communist Gulags in Siberia.
Peoples' outlook to life and work and the future remained largely the same as they have always been - fatalistic. Even today, Vladimir Putin is widely admired in Russia for being a strongman and the Russian Parliament is content to be a rubber-stamp machine for the Government. Putin again has around him a set of 'priviliged' people that are allowed to acquire vast riches. And since Putin cleverly makes sure that no one acquires those riches completely honestly, they all live under a comparable Tsarist/Communist sword of Damocles that their riches and freedom may at any time be taken away again. People accepted under the Tsars, then under Communism and now under Putin that , in the words of one Russian, "nothing is real, everything is possible". Today there are Russian people, many young and intellectual, who will fight for a 'freer' country with better protection under the law and better constraints to power. But of course they were there as well under the Tsars and although less so, under Communism.
This is the kind of question that whole learned books are being written about and which would require an answer dealing with countless aspects of Russian life and mind.
A very brief and not all-too-scientific answer would be that is has been negligible. Basically Communism in Russia built on a culture dating back to the earliest days of Russian culture, where there had always been autocrats with unlimited power ruling over a people that were largely peasants and serfs with a very fatalistic outlook on life.
Communism replaced an autocratic Tsar by autocratic leaders like Stalin and replaced the priviliged nobility with priviliged Party Members; all this while the Tsar's Secret Service and riot troops changed in name only. Well, with the difference that the Tsarist Secret Service was sometimes charmingly inept while the Communist Secret Service was ruthlessly efficient. And banishment to Siberia in Tsarist times was a walk in the park compared with living conditions in Communist Gulags in Siberia.
Peoples' outlook to life and work and the future remained largely the same as they have always been - fatalistic. Even today, Vladimir Putin is widely admired in Russia for being a strongman and the Russian Parliament is content to be a rubber-stamp machine for the Government. Putin again has around him a set of 'priviliged' people that are allowed to acquire vast riches. And since Putin cleverly makes sure that no one acquires those riches completely honestly, they all live under a comparable Tsarist/Communist sword of Damocles that their riches and freedom may at any time be taken away again. People accepted under the Tsars, then under Communism and now under Putin that , in the words of one Russian, "nothing is real, everything is possible". Today there are Russian people, many young and intellectual, who will fight for a 'freer' country with better protection under the law and better constraints to power. But of course they were there as well under the Tsars and although less so, under Communism.
The appeal of communism was that the citizens of living in a communist government would end oppression and result in an economy that would fairly distribute the wealth produced within the country.
Vietnam was simply the "shooting aspect" of the cold war. It would be like two men arguing in a bar (this would be the cold war part), then they go outside and have a fist fight (this would be the Vietnam part).
Soviet expansion in Europe (as a result of Stalin's need to create a buffer zone for the USSR to protect itself from future invasion - they had suffered heavy casualities in WWII, whilst the US had flourished economically) was seen by the US as Stalin trying to spread communism, which to an extent was true. The capitalist US was afraid of communism, which eventually led to the Red Scare. As a result of soviet expansionism, the US decided to set up 'marshall Aid,' which set up funds for the countries of eastern Europe at threat of falling to communism, much to Stalin's dismay. Also, Stalin's expansionism was a problem as he was trying to take Poland and Germany, Poland, the country that England had entered WWII for in the first place. The real problem came to a head when Stalin infringed on the "declaration on liberation Europe" which stated that eatern europeans countries had the freedom to choose the type of government under which they lived. basically, Soviet expansionism really did stem the whole cold war - it brought to the forefront the US's fear of communism and total hostility - the proxy war began over Marshall Aid, and the Berlin Airlift in 1948, which were as a result of soviet expansionism.
The Red scare was the fear of the spread of communism during the cold war.
Britain.
what was a result of Stalin's attempt to promote communism
Late in 1989 Communist rule collapsed in Eastern Europe.
The US was worried that if Vietnam fell to communism it would lead to a domino effect. It was believed that nearby countries would also become communist as a result.
This is what i read in my history classs :) Countries like North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba and China were opressed with foreign intrests in there countries or something like that, and other eastern European countries were forced into communism by Russia...
communism was not contained in Vietnam
There was a war, the result of which was a split. In history, many countries have been split in similar ways - some have recombined. Russi spread communim to china which spread it to north Korea. president Truman wanted to eliminate communism ( it was the cold war). So they moved into south Korea to combat the communism
The result of Stalin's attempts to promote communism were pretty devastating. One result was the fear that was instilled in the people.
In communist countries, towns of those countries. And even more relevant, in common households. Rebellious children are usually a result of controlling and dictating parents... Having a father who believes in communism drove me right out of that house.
They feared the spread of Communism
communism and democracy
Answer this question… They struggled with ethnic conflicts and political instability brought about by the collapse of communism.
15 new countries were created: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Germany, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, & Uzbekistan