It depends on where, what country. But generally speaking, differences between houses in the 1700s versus today would include:
Rice and Potatoes. Google "Columbian Exchange" for more information about the transport of other crops, plants, and pathogens across the Atlantic.
In the 1700's, the Cherokee lived mainly in the southern and south central part of what is now the United States. There were smaller tribes dispersed throughout the nation.
Yes, Sears sold houses. Some people want them considered for historical sites and many are still lived in. Thay had different styles to choose from, such as Cape Cod, New England Cottage, etc. They are scattered over the states. I can't remember the article I read about them in but it stated that many were in disrepair, but they had become very popular again. They are now sought after, fixed up, and enjoy a new life with residences.
They lived in shelter homes and wooden homes
Well, now. A slave revolt is technically slaves having a "mutiny". You know, they had enough of all the work they had to do, so they revolted. Some slaves resorted to violence, and some just decided to escape to freedom. Some also "ambushed" their master's houses and property, by wrecking their houses,etc.
Laws in the 1700s were often based on religious beliefs and were more focused on punishment rather than rehabilitation. Today, laws are more secular and emphasize individual rights, equality, and due process. Additionally, current laws cover a wider range of issues due to societal changes and advancements in technology.
No, not in the 1700s, but now it's fairly popular.
I dun now
Paseta isn't that the same thing as peso
technology
all of them
i dont know, but they got soda now
stability versus change
stability versus change
Forest hill has a mix of different types of houses from studio apartments up. However, most of the original large Victorian houses have now been split up into flats (apartments).
No, but there is Player versus player worlds.
i dont now