There was a strengthened fugitive slave law to help with the capture of escaped slaves.
There was a strengthened fugitive slave law to help with the capture of escaped slaves.
Because both North and South were not intimately satisfied on the terms of the compromise and the fire was mouldering under the ashes.
The terms of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 were effectively overridden with the Compromise of 1850, which opened the territories of Utah and New Mexico to settlement by slave owners as well as those who did not own slaves. One part of the new Compromise was the establishment of the Fugitive Slave Act which helped escaped slaves be returned to their "owners".
this is a complex question. i supported the vietnamese with the possibility of losing my life. we defeated the north vietnamese army in 1968 and could have walked into hanoi and accepted the keys. they don't tell you this in political terms. the us army never gets beat. the politicians get beat. or. the politicians tie the armys hands so they cannot be effective. so i say to anyone who can read these words never blame the army. the army will win. In the Vietnam war: * China rand Russia (and their allies) supported the North Vietnamese * The United States of America succeeded the French in supporting the South Vietnamese
The acquisition of huge territories from Mexico, including California, which was too big to fit the terms of the Missouri Compromise.
There was a strengthened fugitive slave law to help with the capture of escaped slaves.
There was a strengthened fugitive slave law to help with the capture of escaped slaves.
Because both North and South were not intimately satisfied on the terms of the compromise and the fire was mouldering under the ashes.
The term of the compromise 1850 was a group of five bills, passed September 1850, which defuse a four year confrontion between slave states of the south & free states of the north.
The term of the compromise 1850 was a group of five bills, passed September 1850, which defuse a four year confrontion between slave states of the south & free states of the north.
john adms
One example of a country strongly influenced by another is South Korea, which has been heavily influenced by the United States in terms of culture, technology, and military support due to their close political and economic relationship.
It was all one state - that was the trouble. If it had been two states, they could have joined the Union under the terms of the Missouri Compromise, and war might have been averted. Even the final attempted compromise in 1861 proposed the dividing of California as one of the terms. But that compromise was rejected by the newly-elected Lincoln (the first Republican president) because it would have allowed some extension of slavery.
The forthcoming admission of California as a state of the Union - it was too big to fit the terms of the Missouri Compromise, so a new compromise had to be worked out.
There was no compromise in WW2. Unconditional surrender was the only terms accepted by the US/Allies.
Henry Clay helped to pass the Compromise Tariff of 1833 as a resolution to the Nullification Crisis. The compromise gradually reduced taxed on imports for the southerners. This compromise kept South Carolina from seceding from the Union.