0
The Supreme Court overturned their earlier decision in Wolf v. Colorado, (1949) and decided the Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure Clause should be incorporated to the states. Under this decision, all states were required to abide by the Exclusionary Rule developed in Weeks v. US, (1914) that disallows evidence obtained from a suspect through illegal or unreasonable search and seizure from being used to prosecute the defendant in court.
Case Citation:
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoState Courts are held to the same standard as Federal Courts when evidence is obtained without the use of a search warrant, ensuring material obtained without a legitimate search warrant or probable cause cannot be used to prosecute a defendant in any court. This was an important application of the Bill of Rights to criminal procedure.
Case Citation:
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 654 (1961)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The Supreme Court case of Mapp v Ohio established the?
exclusionary rule
Was the decision of the Mapp v Ohio case loose or strict construction?
Loose constuction.
What appellate court heard the mapp v Ohio case?
i like dog food in my cereal
What are the related cases with Mapp v Ohio?
There are no other 'related' cases. The US Supreme Court only takes one representative case for review when considering the constitutionality of a law. If, indeed, there even were other cases, ONLY the Mapp v. Ohio case was chosen.
Who were the parties in Mapp v Ohio?
The parties in Mapp v. Ohio were Dolree "Dolly" Mapp, the petitioner/appellant, and the State of Ohio, the respondent/appellee.Case Citation:Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What type of case was Mapp v Ohio?
Land mark criminal procedure case involving appeals to the Supreme court
What was John F. Kennedy's opinion on the case mapp v Ohio?
I studied the case and never found an opinion by JFK.
What was the date of the Mapp v Ohio case?
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)The case was argued on March 29, 1961. The US Supreme Court released its decision on June 19, 1961.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Who was the defendant in the mapp v Ohio 1962 case?
The Appellant, or Petitioner, in Mapp v. Ohio was Dolree "Dolly" Mapp, a Cleveland woman convicted of possessing obscene materials after police conducted an illegal search of her home because they thought she was harboring a suspect in the bombing of legendary boxing promoter Don King's home. The Appellee, or Respondent, was the State of Ohio, which was defending a challenge of the state statute under which Mapp was convicted as being constitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.The Fourth Amendment issue was introduced in an Amicus brief written by the ACLU, and not argued as part of the case before the Supreme Court.Case Citation:Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What is the precedent of New Jersey V TLO?
Mapp v. Ohio and Terry v. Ohio YES ITS IS BUT NOT REALLY, ITS THE CASE HELD IN SCHOOL WHERE TEACHERS SEARCHED HER WITHOUT ANY LEGAL NOTICE CALLED AS "PROBABLE CAUSE".
How did Mapp v Ohio change the Constitution?
Mapp v Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)Mapp v Ohio didn't change the Constitution, it simply incorporated the Fourth Amendment to the states, requiring them to adhere to that portion of the Bill of Rights and to follow the "exclusionary rule" established in Weeks v US, (1914).For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What were the results of Mapp v Ohio?
The primary result of Mapp v. Ohio, (1961) was that the US Supreme Court incorporated the Fourth Amendment to the States and applied the Exclusionary Rule originally established in Weeks v. US, (1914). The Exclusionary Rule prohibits the prosecution from using evidence obtained illegally (in this case, as the result of wrongful search and seizure) to convict the defendant.More InformationDollree Mapp won her US Supreme Court case, Mapp v. Ohio,(1961), by a vote of 6-3, and her conviction for possession of pornography was vacated, ending the seven-year prison sentence Ohio imposed in 1958.Although Mapp's attorney argued originally argued the Ohio law under which Mapp was convicted was unconstitutional because it was overbroad and infringed on her First Amendment rights, the Supreme Court ultimately decided the case on the basis of a Fourth Amendment search and seizure violation, incorporating that Amendment to the states and extending the federal "exclusionary rule" to prohibit illegally obtained evidence from being used against the defendant in court.Case Citation:Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)
