0
Jean-JacquesRousseau is one of the most influential thinkers during the Enlightenment in eighteenth century Europe. These views are continually discussed among both feminist and Rousseau scholars about of the individual against societal norms, emotions versus reason. Reason is a faculty of awareness; its function is to perceive that which exists by organizing observational data. And reason is a volitional faculty; it has the power to direct its own actions and check its conclusions, the power to maintain a certain relationship to the facts of reality. Emotion, by contrast, is a faculty not of perception, but of reaction to one's perceptions. This kind of faculty has no power of observation and no volition; it has no means of independent access to reality, no means to guide its own course, and no capacity to monitor its own relationship to facts.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the reason Tacitus's observation concerning the Germanic peoples were remarkable for his time?
He viewed the Germanic peoples in his book Germania not as barbarians but admirable in their views on family values which incorporated monogamy and chastity ; virtues he felt worthy of emulation .
What were Patrick Henrys and george masons views on ratification?
what were Patrick Henry's and george mason's views on ratification
What are the three things that affect an historians perspective on past events?
upbringing, political views, and religious views
How did manteo and wanchese differ in the views of the English settlers?
how did Manteo and Wanchese differ in their views of the English settlers
Why would the writings of colonists not be a good source for understanding Native American views?
because their views would be biased. Parts may have some understanding but only Native American's can really shine light on the views.
What were Jean Jacques Rousseau views on reason and emotion?
Jean-JacquesRousseau is one of the most influential thinkers during the Enlightenment in eighteenth century Europe. These views are continually discussed among both feminist and Rousseau scholars about of the individual against societal norms, emotions versus reason. Reason is a faculty of awareness; its function is to perceive that which exists by organizing observational data. And reason is a volitional faculty; it has the power to direct its own actions and check its conclusions, the power to maintain a certain relationship to the facts of reality. Emotion, by contrast, is a faculty not of perception, but of reaction to one's perceptions. This kind of faculty has no power of observation and no volition; it has no means of independent access to reality, no means to guide its own course, and no capacity to monitor its own relationship to facts.
What did Rousseau contribute to society?
He contributed views on religion and women.
What do you think of his views about love?
emotion
How did jean Jacques Rousseau's contribute to the enlightenment?
Rousseau contributed to the Enlightenment by spreading his religious views, and philosophing new thinking.
The views of which two philosophers led to social political and economical reforms?
Locke and Rousseau
What are Rousseau's views on radical freedom?
Rousseau believed that humans were rational entities who only came together in society for mutual interest and development. As a result, the "state of nature" was a situation where people behaved well, but without the comforts and development achieved in society.
What has the author Maria Amelia Mannella written?
Maria Amelia Mannella has written: 'Owen e Rousseau' -- subject(s): Political and social views
What is the reason for the sudden drop in views on my YouTube channel from 6000 views per day to 200 views per day?
Updates on the YouTube algorithms is one of the factors that causes those type of declines on views.
Did voltaire emphasize the general will?
Voltaire did not emphasize the general will in his works. He was critical of Rousseau's concept of the general will, viewing it as potentially authoritarian and prone to oppression. Voltaire's own views leaned more towards individual liberties and freedom of expression.
How do Rousseau and Wordsworth compare in the ways they approach natural man?
Rousseau and Wordsworth both emphasize the purity and simplicity of the natural man, but they differ in their views on society's impact on human nature. Rousseau argues that society corrupts the natural man, while Wordsworth suggests that reconnecting with nature can restore humanity's lost innocence. Despite these differences, both thinkers highlight the importance of the natural world in shaping human character and values.
Does it make any real difference whether you arrive at your views based on reasoning or not?
yes - why would you support those views if you didn't have a reason to?
What has the author Judith Still written?
Judith Still has written: 'Textuality and Sexuality' 'Justice and Difference in the Works of Rousseau' -- subject(s): Social justice, Sex role, Equality, Political and social views
