Mussolini was pro-violence. He believed that if necessary an Italian should die for the good of the state. At the begining of his campaign he even used terror to gain power. Google "Mussolini, Black Shirts" or "Mussolini, OVRA"
He wanted violence
Enough, that they were effective.
US attitude towards WW1 The US didn't want to join the war on anyone's side and followed a policy oferjg0edh98ohgoiudybgh9drfhgr8yhb9regh98eryg
Lincoln would use military force only when necessary.
I think that his attitude to war was that he thought it was 'pointless' and killed many innocent lives. He thought, 'what's the point in being born if you're just going to die a few years later?' Hope this helped! :D x
its when people from talley run around and say i like emmanuel k
Hitler would shoot them since they were of no use for him or use them in experiments.
Australia's "attitude" towards the Vietnam War, mirrored America's attitude.
bowley
"Return with your shield or on it!"
Ted Hughes had a complex attitude towards war. While he acknowledged the brutality and destruction it caused, he also saw war as a fundamental aspect of human nature and a source of inspiration for poetry. He explored themes of conflict, violence, and destruction in his work, often using war as a metaphor for human struggles.
Enough, that they were effective.
During the Vietnam War . Australia attitude towards Asia was cool one aas some countries sided with Vietnam, including Russia and India.
mussolinis conquering of ethiopia
in America people had a negative attitude towards the war. They were still getting over WW1 and believed WW2 was Europe's problem and that we should not get involved.
Something with words
Something with words
he wanted to your mother