answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

European colonization of Southeast Asia had both negative and positive results. Just one example of a positive result was the introduction of 'modern' industrial, commercial, and administrative methods and practices. A negative result was the resentment toward Western culture (sometimes including its 'modern' methods and practices) that built up from colonial abuses and control.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What were the negative and positive results of European colonization of southeast Asia?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are the positive and negative effects of colonization to Asian countries?

trading pooping on ecaudorian llamas


What were the positive effects of the European colonization in the New World?

one of the most richest and powerful countries of Europe.(Spain)


Is a positive plus a negative make a positive or a negative?

Positive + Negative = Negative Negative + Negative = Positive Positive + Positive = Positive Negative + Positive = Negative


What is a negative - positive?

Negative * positive = negative Positive * positive = positive Negative * negative = positive


What were the positive and negative impacts Samuel de Champlain had on Canada's development?

Positive impacts: Samuel de Champlain was instrumental in establishing the first permanent European settlements in Canada, such as Quebec City, which laid the foundation for French colonization in the region. He also established positive relationships with Indigenous peoples through trade and alliances, contributing to the development of the fur trade industry. Negative impacts: Champlain's colonization efforts led to conflicts with Indigenous peoples over land and resources, resulting in violence and displacement. His actions, along with those of other European colonizers, had long-lasting negative effects on Indigenous communities, including the loss of land, culture, and autonomy.


How is dividing integers similar to multiplying integers with the resulting sign?

The rules for the sign (positive or negative) of the result of a multiplication is the same as division. For multiplication: Positive * Positive --> Positive Positive * Negative --> Negative Negative * Positive --> Negative Negative * Negative --> Positive For division: Positive / Positive --> Positive Positive / Negative --> Negative Negative / Positive --> Negative Negative / Negative --> Positive


If a negative is divided by a positive is it negative?

Yes. Negative/negative = positive Postive/Positive = positive Negative/Positive - negative


When multiplying numbers what do you do with the positive and negative signs?

Negative * positive = negative Positive * positive = positive Negative * negative = positive


When you divided a negative number by a positive number witth the answer be positive or negative?

A negative divided by a positive is negative. A negative divided by a negative is positive. A positive divided by a positive is positive. A positive divided by a negative is negative.


Negative plus a positive?

Negatives and Positives Positive + Positive = Positive Negative + Negative = Positive Negative + Positive = Negative Positive + Negative = Negative


How are multiplying integers and dividing integers alike?

a negative x a negative= a positive, a positive x a positive= a positive, a negative x a positive= a negative, and a positive x a negative= a negative. Same thing with division. a negative divided by a negative= a positive, a positive divided by a positive= a positive, a negative divided by a positive= a negative, and a positive divided by a negative is a negative. U see?


What does a positive and a neagive equal?

positive and a positive is a positive negative and a negative is a positive to answer your question: positive and a negative is a negative.