Want this question answered?
no. both sides thought it would be a quick and simple war.
In the Western Theater of the US Civil War, both sides had victories and defeats. For the South, their largest victory was at Chickamauga. At the time, it prevented an incursion into Georgia by Union General Rosencrans.
During WW2, both sides had victories in different battles in Libya, but the Allies were the ultimate victors.
i actually just read a book about the civil war. both sides feel like their soldiers need alot more training. :)
They had run out of volunteers.
no. both sides thought it would be a quick and simple war.
In the Western Theater of the US Civil War, both sides had victories and defeats. For the South, their largest victory was at Chickamauga. At the time, it prevented an incursion into Georgia by Union General Rosencrans.
....
The two sides of the Irish Civil War were the "Republicans" and the "Free Staters".
During the American Civil War, the stalemate that occurred at the end of 1862 resulted from the variety of ineffective battles and campaigns conducted by both sides of the conflict. In the West, numerous Union victories had secured no decisive results. In the East, various Confederate victories achieved the same thing. 1863 was seen by both sides as the year in which something decisive would need to be achieved.
People very rarely changed sides during the English Civil War.
the two sides during the US civil war were the union (North) and the confederacy (south)
During WW2, both sides had victories in different battles in Libya, but the Allies were the ultimate victors.
they only take sides with donkeys
Sebastian
the puritans and the cavaliers.
millatary and colomist also know as righties and lefties were the opposing sides in El Salvador's civil war <3