When one Googles skeptic griggsy what might one state yea or nay about his argumentation against God?

Answer 1

One might state that he is a poor speller and hates to bother to use spell checkers, indicating a certain laziness of character. One might then go on to extrapolate that this laziness of character is reflected periodically in his laziness of thinking. One might also state that he has too much time on his hands since retirement, and needs to find something more useful to do with his time left on Earth, than to argue about things that he really can't prove one way or the other, because his OPPONENTS never change their minds EITHER! One might also state that he is quite aware of his condition, as he himself states that his posts may be impeded by his defective cortex. One might also state that he is held helplessly imprisoned in the firm grasp of a loving God, who relentlessly keeps his focus on practically NOTHING but issues about God. Being God, he cares not a fig about how long it takes for his DEAR child to wake up and realize that the faulty notions that his skeptics hold on the nature and character that have been falsely attributed to him aren't particularly threatening to him either. Having all of eternity to wait out mortals, he can afford to be exceedingly patient and forebearing. People frequently twist truths around to their own ends, and "Griggsy" seems to have swallowed plenty of "cinnamon twists" in his time, and has somehow failed to realize the difference between "natural food" and "manufactured parodies of truth" in the process. One might also state that if his hair bristles at reading any of this, that he asked for it, (see question history). Surely he can't expect everyone to maintain the same level of ignorance indefinitely, can he?