A dirty bomb is an explosive device designed to eject or spray radioactive material over a small area. It does not produce mass amounts of fallout compared to a traditional nuclear device, since there is no fission involved. A conventional explosive such as those used on Oklahoma City, Beirut or the first World Trade Center attack, if packed with powdered or pelleted radioactive material (strontium, plutonium, etc.) would eject that material into buildings, parks, streets and people in the surrounding area. While the immediate death count would be low, many people would suffer from radiation sickness. Cleanup would be massively expensive and time-consuming. An area of several square miles would likely be uninhabitable for years.
Potential terrorists would buy the material on the black market from sources such as former Soviet Union countries, North Korea or the Middle East. Getting it refined in secret would be somewhat difficult. Transporting it to the target area would also be hard but not impossible.
*** I agree with the first part of the above answer, however anyone who is even fairly determined can get radioactive material. it is found is some medical equiptment, and other sources. The radio active material can be put in a regular pipe, or car bomb. If exploded in a populated area it would spread the radioactive materiel over a large area. Large numbers of people would have increased rates of cancer and other radation sicknesses. Other people would likely be injured by the direct blast and first responders would be in danger when going into rescue the wounded. The history (discovery, one of them) did a show on what would happen if a terrorist attacked with either a dirty bomb or a full atomic bomb. They did a good job and it is worth watching.
Soutullo? If you don't know what I'm talking about, never mind. Weapons, weapons weapons!
no, beam weapons are highly impractical in the atmosphere. there is too much distortion, absorption, and scattering.
Robert Oppenheimer was the chief scientist of the US development of atomic weapons. Thousands of people worked on the bomb in various capacities
Nuclear weapons are very expensive. Jamaica does not have nearly the kind of economy that permits the building or purchase of such expensive weapons. And nobody is going to invade Jamaica anyway. Jamaica does not need nuclear weapons.
Although US agreed several arms agreements banning use of nuclear weapons, USA DOES use nuclear weapons and in fact, US is the ONLY nation to have used nuclear weapons in war.
Terrorists often use bombs and bullets. They also use biological and chemical weapons.
Terrorists use all sorts of weapons in attacks. A tried and true favorite of terrorists are bombs, guns, and knives. These are also the tried and true favorites of every army.
Which terrorists, where at, and which time period? There are a number of organizations declared terrorist organizations throughout the world.
Nuclear weapons do not deter terrorists and indeed the use of nuclear weapons appeals to terrorists. During the Cold War large superpowers acheived a stalemate since neither side wanted to start a nuclear conflict which could result in Mutual Assured destruction however terrorists have no such concerns.
They used missiles, bombs, fuel-laden planes, and biological weapons.
its a G 242 ak 47 and a knife
Various means. During the Cold War, both the Warsaw Pact and NATO provided weapons to 'questionable' groups who supported their interests, and there's still enough Cold War weaponry floating around to supply terrorists and insurgency movements for decades to come.
Tanks
The most devastating world war 1 weapons had to be machine guns, mustard gas, and artillery. Mustard gas was a really nasty chemical that created big blisters on the flesh and lungs if inhaled.
That is unknown, but one of the concerns is that they may supply them to terrorists.
The development of devastating new weapons technologies.
because the stupid terrorists already have IEDs