Kennedy Space Center in Florida is the preferred option. Edwards Airforce Base in California is the next site to be utilized if landing in Florida is unsafe, usually because of poor visibility or high winds. On one occasion only, a shuttle landed at White Sands in New Mexico, and this is the third option.Globally, there is a network of emergency landing sites, none of which have yet been used. See the link below.
This is a great question, there are a lot of techniques implemented which depend upon various factors such as the gravity of the planet, and the nature of the atmosphere. Because distances to the planets are great, spacecraft usually arrive at high speed and will need some kind of braking to prevent impact or burn damage. This can be provided in various ways, thrust by engines, high speed air braking by grazing the atmosphere, or a direct penetration of the atmosphere with a heat shield that slows through friction (and may be cooled by ablative surfaces); once entering the planet's atmosphere, passive deceleration techniques can be used, often parachutes. (The first attempt for a space vehicle to land on a planet was the Russian Venera 7 on Venus, whose parachute malfunctioned and the probe landed badly and was thought to have rolled onto its side.) Once slow enough, impact with the surface can be softened with brief retro-rockets, or with large gasbags such that the surface module package will bounce and come to a halt through friction. NASA designed landers for Martian surface rovers that used this technique, after which it's necessary to deflate and retract the gas bags; a tetrahedral shaped casing was designed such that regardless of which face of the unit was on the surface, the unfolding of the trifoliate design like three flower petals opening up would place the probe correctly on the "base" surface ready to drive-off the platform. One particularly complicated technique for a heavier Martian surface rover which worked brilliantly was a combination sky-crane: the spacecraft braked into the atmosphere using a heat shield, deployed a parachute, discarded the parachute and heat shield, leveled using retro rockets, then lowered the lander gently on a series of cables from this rocket-stabilized platform, which then flew off to crash at a safe distance once the payload was on the surface.
Occasionally, a brute force technique is used where there is no real further softening of the landing after entry and the instrument package is hardened sufficiently to land at higher speeds and still meet mission objectives.
In the case of the Lunar landings of the Apollo missions, a semi-automatic technique was used that a human operator could override for lateral movement in selection of an improved landing site clear of debris, and a reaction control system (RCS) used a cant sensor to keep the naturally-unstable lunar module upright during descent.
No. A meteorite is an object that has already come through the Earth's atmosphere from space. On the way down, they are called meteors. A space shuttle, whether above or below the atmosphere, would need to avoid meteors at all costs. Since meteors are just rocks on the way from space to Earth, a shuttle therefore could not travel to them. Two kinds of space objects that spacecraft "could" travel to are comets and asteroids. But the space shuttle is not the proper kind of vehicle for such explorations.
something that land in the earth
No space shuttle has ever reached the moon. The 5 manned missions to land on the moon were the Apollo missions 11 though 17, with the exception of Apollo 13, which was unable to land due to a malfunction.
in a rocket or by space shuttles that land on planets and take photos also by telescope special ones that tell distances and take photos cool
No. The space shuttle is built for low Earth orbit, not moon landings.
Space Shuttles do not land in Houston
The space shuttle landed on Earth, so yes.
Space shuttles don't land on the moon. They only went between the Earth's surface and orbit. The didn't carry enough fuel to get to the moon, and couldn't land there anyhow. No atmosphere, no runway, no Place to refuel.
No, they land on a runway.
Space shuttles do not have the capacity to hold enough fuel to reach the moon. Also, they could not land on the moon as they need a runway and have no other alternative way of landing. They are designed to land in Earth's atmospheric conditions. All round, they are most unsuitable for reaching the moon and were only designed to be in earth orbit.
They don't. The shuttles were designed for Earth Orbit only.
What makes the space shuttles different than other space craft is that they are reusable. Most spacecraft are used one time, then disposed of. The Russian Soyuz and the American Apollo spacecraft are examples of this. Another difference is the way they return to Earth. After other spacecraft reenter Earth's atmosphere, they deploy parachutes and make water landings (US Apollo), or land in snow (Russian Soyuz). The space shuttle lands like an airplane.
The U.S. program to land humans on the moon and return them safely to Earth.
space shuttles fly in space and then like an aeroplane it lands on a runway with a parachute flying out the back
The reptile that have to be cleared from the runway before they can land the shuttles at the Kennedy Space Center are female turtles. They will come on shore during the night to lay their eggs.
When the space shuttle goes through the atmosphere, the space shuttle can then by itself land safely because no fuel will be needed. You can use the atmosphere of the earth to slow the space shuttle down allowing it land safely with the payload. The payload will still be on the space shuttle because it won't be removed, only the equipment will be removed from the space shuttle. The shuttle has to do no work whatsoever when bringing it back to earth because it won't be needing fuel when landing on earth.
No. A meteorite is an object that has already come through the Earth's atmosphere from space. On the way down, they are called meteors. A space shuttle, whether above or below the atmosphere, would need to avoid meteors at all costs. Since meteors are just rocks on the way from space to Earth, a shuttle therefore could not travel to them. Two kinds of space objects that spacecraft "could" travel to are comets and asteroids. But the space shuttle is not the proper kind of vehicle for such explorations.