The Pit, as it was called, was not actually that much lower than the lowest tier of seats. The Globe Theatre, like many theatres of its time, was a circular building with a large unroofed courtyard in the middle. This courtyard, into which the stage projected, was where those who bought one-penny seats stood. These standees, called "groundlings" stood right up to the very edge of the stage.
the poor people stood in the pits because they couldn't afford a ticket.
The Groundlings or Penny Standers stood in the Yard, sometimes also called the Pit, near the front and sides of the thrust stage.
on the floor
Because there weren't enough seats.
The more wealthy people were placed in the balconies, overlooking the stage, while the poorer were on the floor in front of it.
Many of the richer people who sat up in the galleries attended the Globe Theater in the 1600's but many poorer people attended the plays in the central yard also.
The social classes in the theatre were arranged so the richer, higher class people had the better veiw and more comfortable seats. As the theatres in shakespeares day were usually circular in shape this meant that the better seats were higher up. The poorer seats were in the open air space in the middle or the theatre with no seats unlike the richer classes above them.
All types of Londoners went to the Globe and the other Southwark theatres. The groundlings included working men, "working women", theives, apprentices, and other poorer people. Merchant class, professionals and nobility sat in the stalls or on the stage.
Poorer
saris for poorer people and western clothes for the wealthy
They were wealthy people
Yes, and their jobs were pretty much the same as today's jobs, but without the modern conveniences. Of course, in Rome, as in all cities, there were the idlers who did not work steady or did not work at all, depending on the public dole to eat, and doing odd jobs for gambling and drinking money.
The more wealthy people were placed in the balconies, overlooking the stage, while the poorer were on the floor in front of it.
Yes, wealthy nations have a moral responsibility to aid poorer nations by sharing their resources. Providing essentials like food and education can help alleviate poverty and improve the quality of life in those regions. International cooperation is essential for creating a more equitable world.
Poorer citizens foght for their rights and to keep the wealthy fromreciving special privileges.
The rich got richer and the poor got poorer
Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.
Muhammad demanded that the wealthy give away some part of their wealth to look after the poor and the wealthy did not want their money taken from them. It is the same reason that most wealthy individuals in democracies vote against left-wing programs that redistribute wealth; they do not want to lose their money.
Many of the richer people who sat up in the galleries attended the Globe Theater in the 1600's but many poorer people attended the plays in the central yard also.
mud huts in the poorer part of the country, regular, standard, European houses in the wealthy parts
No. Jewish laws apply to the wealthy and the poor in exactly the same manner.