0
Which part of the historian argument references specific examples of historical evidence?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the main arguments reasons and evidence that support the perspective of Historian B?
l don't know
Why is it important for a historian to use primary sources?
Primary sources that are thoughtfully selected can help to bring history and cultures to life for students. Most basically, they are defined as the direct evidence of a time and place that you are studying - any material (documents, objects, etc.) that was produced by eyewitnesses to or participants in an event or historical moment under investigation. Primary sources are interesting to read for their own sake: they give us first hand, you-are-there insights into the past. They are also the most important tools an historian has for developing an understanding of an event. Primary sources serve as the evidence an historian uses in developing an interpretation and in building an argument to support that interpretation. You will be using primary sources not only to help you better understand what went on, but also as evidence as you answer questions and develop arguments about the past. Primary Sources do not speak for themselves, they have to be interpreted. That is, we can't always immediately understand what a primary source means, especially if it is from a culture significantly different from our own. It is therefore necessary to try to understand what it means and to figure out what the source can tell us about the past.
Can you give me an example sentence with the word historical?
historical evidence suggests this theory. The war was Historical.
Why did the croatan Indians kill the the colonists of the lost colony?
It isn’t sure they did. In fact, new historical evidence points to the possibility that they lived with them. They had a village down river from the colony and recent historical evidence has found English items in the village and evidence they were living with them.
What is a sentence for the word historical?
These historical documents are of extreme importance.This is a historical site.
What part of the historian's argument references specific examples of historical evidence?
Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones.
Which part of the historian's argument does not rely on any historical evidence?
In his opinion, it is morally wrong for any political movement to use any violence to achieve its goals
What does historical synthesis mean?
Historical synthesis is the process an historian engages in to transform evidence into a final historical account (O'Brien, 1935)
Can a historian determine whether or not a claim is valid?
Check to see that it is supported by historical evidence.
What can influence a historian's interpretation?
A historian's interpretation can be influenced by their personal biases, cultural background, political beliefs, and the available evidence. Additionally, the historian's education, research methods, and the historical context in which they are working can also shape their interpretation.
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.
You need an assigment on the topic of historical research?
I'm not a historian; this is just an idea. How about looking at how forensic science has impacted historical research? I understand that we have just identified the mummy of Hatshepsut based on forensic evidence.
What are some evidence of Jesus' living?
The historical records of the time in other histories. Such as Roman history. Also other historical books such as the bible. Jesus of Nazareth was mentioned by the Jewish historian Josephus in his writings.
When should you use indirect evidence?
Indirect evidence should be used when you don't have direct or conclusive proof of a particular fact or conclusion but have supporting information that implies it. It can help build a stronger case or argument when direct evidence is lacking or ambiguous. Indirect evidence can be particularly useful in investigations, historical research, and scientific inquiries.
What if true would suggest that the historian's document is a strong source of evidence for historical interpretation?
Undoubtedly the historian's document is a positive and strong source of evidence for historical interpretation provided it is not affected by personal prejudices, selfish national interests or affiliations. History is seldom honest. Mostly it has been mis-interpreted and distorted because of certain vested interests - may be it be the history of Aryans, Greek, Roman or American History
Why is it important to examine evidence of an argument?
It is very important to examine the evidence of an argument in order to come to a valid conclusion for said argument. If one does not have all the evidence, an invalid conclusion could be made.
Which element is needed for a sound argument?
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
