In so many words, the framers of the US Constitution spelled that out in the First Amendment. I believe they wanted that amendment included because the Church of England had set a bad example of religious intolerance in Great Britain. Of course times have changed and the UK does not impede religious worship or ideas.
Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom argued that government control over religious beliefs was a form of tyranny.
Firstly the government (if democratic) must treat everyone equal and provide them with the same rights, and they must also follow their charter when it says equal rights for all and the freedom of expression for all. Secondly since religion is the base foundation in a lot of people's lives restricting or limiting it can result in serious disagreements. The government may want to limit religious rights in order to have full control.
They wanted a government free from tyranny and with more freedoms such as religious and a little voice in the government.
Neither. The oligarchy is a religious run government while a tyranny is a secular dictator. Both do not give people choice nor civil rights.
He believed that a democratic government would stop the unjust majorities from taking control over the government.
Tyranny means unfair or wrongly used power. Tyranny is an individual who has seized control, usually and illegally
Tyranny
tyranny
large factions might capture control of the government and ignore the rights of those in the minority
Tyranny, that's the word you're looking for!The word that best describes a cruel and unjust government is a Tyranny.
Tyranny, that's the word you're looking for!The word that best describes a cruel and unjust government is a Tyranny.
Usually a tyrannical government has a dictator.
Tyranny