0
Who is more deserving of the title founder of Singapore Crawfurd Raffles or Farquhar?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
I think that the founding of Singapore should not be based on just one of the three men: Stamford Raffles, William Farquhar or John Crawfurd. I think that the founding of Singapore should be credited to all the three men and all the others that helped them found Singapore. Raffles came up with the idea of turning Singapore into a successful trading port of the British, Farquhar helped develop Singapore and governed it through its early years, while Crawfurd helped to turn Singapore into a British colony so the British could fully enjoy the benefits the port could offer, such as increased autonomy to make decisions to get more revenue from Singapore as a trade port. Without any one of the three men, Singapore would not have become what it was today. It was the combined effort of these three men that turned Singapore into such a successful and popular port. Each of them had their own contribution to founding Singapore, and each of their contributions is valuable in its own way. Without even one of these men, Singapore would still be a sleepy fishing village. Without Raffles's vision that Singapore would someday be a successful port, Singapore would not have been developed by the British at all as it had no apparent potential at that time. Without Farquhar, Singapore would not have survived through its first difficult years as a new nation, and would have collapsed along with the British's dream of finding a viable trade port to facilitate trade between India and China. Without Crawfurd, Singapore would still be under Malay control, and the port might just have ended when Raffles passed on after firing Farquhar. In conclusion, I feel that these three men, and not forgetting all those that contributed to the founding of Singapore, should all be credited with the founding of Singapore and given the respect they deserve for completely redesigning Singapore and turning it from an obscure and sleepy fishing village to a bustling trade port.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is William Farquhar the Founder of Singapore?
no he is not Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles is the founder. William farquhar is the 1st resident of Singapore.He was in charge of everything in Singapore when stamford raffles left Singapore.
Is john Crawfurd the founder of Singapore?
Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles founded Singapore in 1819. On 29 January 1819, Raffles together with Major William Faquhar and some sepoys rowed in a small boat to the mouth of Singapore River. When they landed, Raffles and his entourage went to meet the Temenggong at his house.
What did Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles do when he came back to Singapore?
when Raffles came back to Singapore, he found out that Farquhar had done a bad job of raising the city. Farquhar had introduced opium selling in order to get money for raising Singapore. Raffles then separated the different races with a town plan. He also stopped opium selling.
Who is the Singapore founder?
Raffles did contribute to the raising of Singapore but I think William Farquhar also deserves some of the credit. He was the person who really developed Singapore while Raffles was away. Although he did not use Raffles plan, he was quite successful.
Who founded Singapore?
Sang Nila Utama founded Singapore but Sir Stamford Raffles is the founder of modern Singapore. Juinano: However, Major William Farquhar was the major contributor to Singapore's success. Raffles just signed the treaty and left soon after, only to return at intervals to check on progress. Thus, most of Singapore's success is attributed to Major William Farquhar. Thus, he should be the rightful ruler of Singapore.
Why was William Faquar sacked by Stamford Raffles?
William Farquhar was dismissed by Stamford Raffles due to disagreements over governance policies in early Singapore. Farquhar's lenient and profit-oriented approach clashed with Raffles' vision of stricter control over trade and development in the region. Raffles believed that Farquhar’s policies were hindering the long-term strategic interests of the British administration.
Who was William Farquhar?
Someone who is sort of Stamford Raffles's assistant and someone who contributed a lot to Singapore in becoming a better place.
Who is stamford raffles assistant?
William Farquhar
Who was the first president of Singapore?
Raffles did contribute to the raising of Singapore but I think William Farquhar also deserves some of the credit. He was the person who really developed Singapore while Raffles was away. Although he did not use Raffles plan, he was quite successful.
Did raffles and farquhar have good relations?
Yes they were in love
Who is the main founder of Singapore?
LOL ok I just learnt this in history this year. Gonna see how much I can remember. XD anyway, it depends on what is your definition of 'founder'. Most of us would automatically think, Sir Stamford Raffles. But actually, his partner, William Farquhar, was the one who made Singapore flourish and prosper. He helped with the problems Singapore faced in her early years, whereas all Raffles did was to have the amazing foresight that Singapore would be a good trading port (that's why the two of them came to Singapore). Also, there is John Crawfurd, who signed some treaty of some sort, which allowed the British to have the whole of Singapore. All in all, there is no real 'founder', all of them - all of the people in the past had a part in building up singapore's past to the present. Yeah, so, hope I helped you in some sort. ~sorry if there's any typo/wrong info~ ^^
What did farquhar do for Singapore?
With his long Malayan experience, and an intimate knowledge of Riau-Lingga politics, Major Farquhar was given the task to help Sir Stamford Raffles found a settlement on Singapore island. He helped negotiate the provisional agreement of 30 January 1819 with the local chieftain Temmengong Abdul Rahman of Johore; and the more formal Singapore Treaty of 16 February 1819, which Raffles signed with the Temmengong and His Highness the Sultan Hussein Mohammed Shah, confirming the right for the British to set up a trading post.
