in 1066 King Edward the confessor died, so England had to find a new king, as King Edward had no children. Whereas three other people who claimed the throne, they were:
Harrold Godwinson's claim to the throne was tht he's the most poweful man in England. He has also ben loyal to the the previous king. Also he was Edwards brother-in-law as his sister married Edward. Edward had promised Harrold that he would be the future king.
Williams claim is that he knew how to rule as he was already ruling. Also William was Edwards cousin. William is also said he he was promised the crown.
Harrald Hardraada's claim was that previously England was ruled by Norway, with a Danish King - King Cnut - as their 'leader'.
Harrold, son of Earl Godwinson, was chosen King by the chief noblemen of England. However he had no time to celebrate as William and Harrald were coming to try and steel the crown. King Harrold went down south to wait for William as Harrold thought that he would arrive first, but he was wrong. Harrald Hardraada arrived first, so Harrold had to travel north to fight Hardraada, in the end King Harrold won. But a few hours after winning that battle they heard that William had just arrived back down south. While Harrold was trecking back down south, William and his army wee preparing for the big battle. In the end William's troups won by tricking the English. The English were surrounded by shields so the Normans (Williams troups) prentened to retreat, and the English went after them, but once the English broke rank the Normans stopped, turned back and killed them. Amoungst those who were killed was Godwindson so William was the crowned king, so William was and still is known as William the Conqueror.
Hope this helps! x
Does not answer question but........... Hopeful heirs lay claim to the throne as worldwide search comes to an end
Hundreds of hopefuls have laid claim to the crown following a worldwide quest to find the historical heir to the English Throne, to mark the opening of a new £2.6m visitor centre at 1066 Battle of Hastings, Abbey and Battlefield in East Sussex. English Heritage placed a series of classified advertisements in newspapers around the world asking people who could trace their family tree back to The Battle of Hastings in 1066 to come forward. The aim was to see who may have lain claim to the throne today had William the Conqueror not defeated King Harold in 1066. Claimants had to prove that their ancestors included either King Harold, his brother-in-law Edward the Confessor or Edgar the Aetheling, who was chosen to be king but never crowned. The response was overwhelming with hundreds of claims arriving from around the world, including France, Italy, Norway, the Netherlands and Sweden, and as far away as Australia and Canada. More than a quarter of all claims came from the USA. Supported by extensive family trees, the claims were scrutinised by a team of expert historians and genealogists including Dr Nick Barratt from BBC's "Who Do You Think You Are?" Dr Barratt explained that they were looking for St Margaret of Scotland as the key to a royal lineage. "A direct descendant of Alfred the Great, she was related to both Edward the Confessor and Edgar the Aetheling. If people can trace their lineage back to St Margaret, they're well connected to two of the key players, whose roles are explored in the interactive exhibition in the new visitor centre. " As part of its remit to involve people in history, English Heritage wanted to explore what might have happened had Harold not died in October 1066 - and as many of the claimants met the desired criteria, it's fair to suggest that England could have suffered something of a power struggle! So if William hadn't conquered, who might be on the throne now? Mark Golledge from Berkshire has access to an impressive historical document to support his claim. The "Stemmata Chicheleana", published in 1765, records all the descendents of Archbishop Henry Chichele, the founder of All Souls College, Oxford. With the Archbishop's father as one of his ancestors, Mr Golledge can quickly and accurately trace his family back from Chichele to his ancestor, Alfred the Great. Albert Turnbull from Newcastle can not only trace his lineage back to St Margaret and King Alfred but also to William the Conqueror, so his family may have had a claim regardless of the result at the Battle of Hastings. And, after years of painstaking research, a trip to the Libraries and Records Offices in Dublin led Judith Di-Sandolo to a family connection with the 15th Earl of Oxford, and from there back to St Margaret. On a rather lighter note other claims include Mary McVicar, a Canadian who claims she can trace her family back to Lady Godiva, and Jeremy Greville-Heygate from Leicestershire who argues that his military experience, and large estate (car) stand him in good stead as a potential monarch - although only after negotiating a suitable salary. English Heritage aims to feature a number of the claims at their new visitor centre at 1066 Battle of Hastings, Abbey and Battlefield. Dr Tracy Borman, Learning Director at English Heritage, said, "1066 was a turning point in English history and one of the most gripping periods in the country's past. People can come and explore this watershed moment at the new visitor centre at Battle Abbey." The architect-designed two-level visitor centre houses an auditorium and exhibition space where a dramatic film using vivid animation and the latest in computer generated images and imaginative interactive displays explains the extraordinary history of the Battle of Hastings and its significance in history as the beginning of modern England.
duke William of Normandy was the most likely.
Edgar aetheling
Harold godwinson
harald hadrada
and William duke of Normandy (my fav)
lol
willaim the conqueor won the throne
wiam of Normandy
k'[polkjhbgvbn mhjyuthfngcbv
There were 3 main contenders for the throne. They were: # William of Normandy # Hararld Haddrada # Harold Godwineson
You can not actually say who is the best out of the three contenders, William Duke of Normandy, Harold Godwinson and Harald Hardrada. William Duke of Normandy became the King of England, in 1066, after beating Harold Godwinson in the battle of Hastings. Harold Godwinson was promised the throne by Edward the Confessor on his deathbed, which was approved by a witan. Harald Hardrada was beaten by Harold Godwinson in Stamford bridge, but was also promised the throne by his father King Cnut. By Hammiixx
* * * *
they were both one of the contenders of the English throne
There is a direct heir to the throne Prince Charles the Prince of Wales.
There were 3 main contenders for the throne. They were: # William of Normandy # Hararld Haddrada # Harold Godwineson
You can not actually say who is the best out of the three contenders, William Duke of Normandy, Harold Godwinson and Harald Hardrada. William Duke of Normandy became the King of England, in 1066, after beating Harold Godwinson in the battle of Hastings. Harold Godwinson was promised the throne by Edward the Confessor on his deathbed, which was approved by a witan. Harald Hardrada was beaten by Harold Godwinson in Stamford bridge, but was also promised the throne by his father King Cnut. By Hammiixx
* * * *
he said edward promised him the throne
Edward the Confessor (1042-1066)
William of Normandy, William the Conqueror, William the Bastard, William I.
5th January 1066
they were both one of the contenders of the English throne
He had promised three people the throne
There is a direct heir to the throne Prince Charles the Prince of Wales.
25th December 1066 - 9th September 1087.
It is known as the Battle of Hastings in 1066.