answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

A federal law wins.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who wins state law v federal law?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which Supreme Court case established the superiority of federal law over State law?

McCulloch v. Maryland


Why was the ruling in mcculloch v .Maryland significant?

Because the Supreme Court established the supremacy of state law over federal law


Why was ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland significant?

Because the Supreme Court established the supremacy of state law over federal law


Martin v hunter's lessee?

In the case of Martin v. Hunter's Lessee in 1816, the U.S. Supreme Court asserted its authority to review state supreme court decisions involving federal law. This decision established the principle of federal court supremacy over state courts in matters concerning the interpretation of federal law.


Name two federal court cases that broadened federal power at the expense of the state?

Cases that broadened federal power at the state's expense are Helvering v. Gerhardt and Veazie Bank v. Fenno.


Was Plessy v Ferguson a federal or state case?

Plessy v Ferguson was a federal case that reached the United States Supreme Court. It involved a challenge to a Louisiana state law that required separate railroad cars for black and white passengers. The Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v Ferguson in 1896 established the "separate but equal" doctrine, which allowed racial segregation.


What did the decision in the case of marbury v Madison define?

Chief Justice John Marshall's opinion in 1803's Marbury v. Madison established the principle of judicial review - the ability of federal courts to find a federal or state law inconsistent with the US Constitution.


State of Montana has passed legislation to limit the amount of nantucket baskets made in Massachusetts that can be sold in Montana you are asked to file a complaint in federal court to fight the law?

The hypothetical law you have proposed is unconstitutional based on the commerce clause of the US Constitution. The law discriminates on its face against commerce from another state. Supreme court jurisprudence on this matter is very clear: when a law is facially discriminatory in this way, it is unconstitutional. See, City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey, and C.A. Carbone v. Clarkstown. Because this is a constitutional law issue, it is a federal question, and the federal court therefore has jurisdiction.


Which of these court cases established the concept of separate but equal facilities for blacks and whites is the supreme law for all judges at either the state or federal level?

Plessy v. Ferguson


Why was the Gibbon's V. Ogden case so important?

The Gibbons v. Ogden case was important because it established the supremacy of federal law over state law in regulating interstate commerce. This case clarified the federal government's authority to regulate commerce among states, setting a precedent for future decisions on federal power. It also played a key role in shaping the interpretation of the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.


In McCulloch v Maryland the Constitution s supremacy clause was interpreted to establish that a national law is always supreme over conflicting state law True or false?

It is true, this stems from the Supreme Court's application of the Supremacy Clause. Federal law supersedes all state treaties generated under the Tenth Amendment.


What is the longest winning streak for Michigan v Michigan state?

Michigan with 14 wins next its michigan with 9 wins and next its michigan with 8 wins... GO BLUE!