Ninjas are probably more powerful than pirates because although pirates have guns and swords, ninjas are stealthy and would never be seen by a pirate in the first place, and then the ninja (like most ninjas) carry out a silent assassination. The pirate would never know what hit him/her. What ninjas lack in special weapons, they excel in stealth and ability.
Ninjas obviously. They know kung-fu.
Ninjas are cool for learning Martial Arts and studying the arts of jujitsu, kung
fu, martial arts, and karate. Also, Ninjas are trained to fight for self defense and not for evil!
Def. Ninjas they are quiet and stealth like so they could just sneak attack and beat them.
Oh and remember that one word that the ninjas have nothing to fight?
Ninjas did have guns, they didn't like to use them but they did if they had to.
Ninjas would win because they're usually sober and stealthy unlike pirates. For more proof ask if us ninjas wear underwear. That will be all . . . ninja out ninjas wear underwear?
Ninjas, of course - pirates massacred. They're not that agile compared to ninjas ya know. Ninjas are trained assassins and experts in their own cohort plus pirates use huge scary weapons easy to Dodge....
PiratesGood question but a pirate would be stronger because they have determination.Pirates are way better for these reasons: They get the girls, they have guns, and the drink a lot of rum. What more can you ask for?
Plus pirates get booty. Although, while most of that is true, you must keep in mind the fact the pirates are out at sea for years at a time...with lots and lots of men.
They are cool if you are all for the blowing up others ships, and stealing because there are still pirates till this day and they live in the Atlantic Ocean and that is all they do.
Pirate. Let me break it down for ya: Ninja=Martial arts, Dazzling moves. Pirate=Flintlock pistol.... Nuff' said.
If they were just walking along and ran into each other the pirate would win. Ninjas are based more on stealth well, as we all know, Pirates are more hand-to-hand on a normal basis. The Pirate would kill the ninja.
The fact is that no real ninjas exist in fairyland (pirates still do, by the way). Look in the news. How often do you hear about walloping kangaroos in the news? And what about pirates? All the time antidisestablishmentarianism is on the rise. And no one can dodge a hamster; that's just plain dumb. A bullet flies at over 1 mph a fat human being could never move that fast. It is physically impossible.
Hello are you nuts? Do you know what ninjas were? They were petty thieves they have all that stealth training because they waited in the bamboo forests for caravans to come and they would ambush them. So morally they are no better than Pirates so the whole good not evil thing is horsh crap. And Hello Pirates have lived on there ship for years! They know every nook and cranny, so then while the ninjas wandered around the pirates would be the ones hiding and sneaking up on the ninjas!
Pirates would win because they have guns and swords and Ninjas don't have anything except there karate moves.
GUNS!And there still are some ninjas out there today; they are called... the FBI! (Just kidding). There are still ninjas out there somewhere. Summary...Whether one is better than the other, or if they are equal in prowess, is just personal opinion.My Qualifications; Martial Arts Instructor, trained primarily in Karate, BJJ and Boxing.
The edge here is definitely with the Knight, assuming a more-or-less "fair" fight where both people meet in the open during daytime in full combat regalia. Naturally, this type of conflict will most likely be avoided by the Ninja. The determining factor, therefore, goes to who gets to pick the time and place of the conflict - A knight able to force a confrontation openly would likely be able to defeat a Ninja, while a Ninja able to ambush a Knight who was inadequately prepared would almost certainly win.
Knights and Samurai were very similar. Both lived in a feudal society, had codes of honor, they were both horsemen, all that stuff, but Samurai would take all. Samurai is the deadliest warrior before the invention of firearms. The knight is a slow and easy target because of all its armor. It's halmet alone has the weight of a five-year old! It would suck to be a knight's horse! The Samurai's armor is about as strong and way lighter. One hit with the Samurai's kanabo and the knight won't even have enough time to get up before the Samurai slices the knight precisley on point blank. A knight's weapons were made for short range. It's longest range weapon is a bowcaster. A samurai has a bow and arrow called a yumi. World's first sniper. It has been tested that it can hit your eye from 15 yards! True, the knight has a halmet with eye-guards, but do you really think the guy can see a thing with that much armor on his head?! I don't care how buff you are tin-man! Nobody can carry that much armor on his whole, body and be able to run with it, much less fight with it! Go back to Hollywood! Gee, no wonder you need that horse. Another thing! When Samurai were three, they started training, had to protect their family and were taught directly from their masters. They were also taught at schools. Knights were taken at age 7 and were taught how to manage an estate, dance and make poetry. POETRY! When they they did start to train, they did chores for their master,then trained, and hoped to learn something from their masters in battle (which rarely happened) by the end of the day. They were squires. Some did not go into knighthood, some stayed squires forever! Knights also had a code called chivalry which was not used in wars. One of the main reasons they went on crusades was the Arabian riches they would steal. Samurai wanted to bring honor to their family and protect their master in this life and if possible, the next. Plus, the weapons the Samurai used were wicked! They had two swords that could slice through three bamboo mats in 1/3 of a second (see deadliest warrior samurai vs. viking). It is flexible and non-brittle (not very stiff and easy to break). The knight had a heavy and brittle sword that matches their armor: slow and huge. The samurai had a club called a kanabo that could break swords and bones and needles to say, knock the knight off his feel, knock off the weapons on his hands, and dent armor. he had (as I said before) snipe eye-sized targets from 15 yards with the same size of a longbow (sometimes, longbows have the strength to peirce some armor). The knight has a crossbow, taking whatever strength the knight has left to reload it for a limited range. They left the bows to the peasants. They had a mace called the morning star which might be considered a good weapon with all its power, but the Samurai's Naginata could go as fast as the samurai's swords and with more range (spear-range). Plus, it requires less control than a weapon that can actually hit you. So there you have it: why the Samurai wins all. Better weapons, armor, training, and motive.
a pirate because a pirate has guns like the blunderbuss that could go through the knights armor
Who can slit your throat in a blink of an eye? A ninja.
Ninjas are cowards.
I think a ninja because a ninja is more powerful that is my answer.
the impact of the flail is the ability to fight a knight and have a chance of winning there for making a good possibility for you to win the war
If it was a fist fight I would say the cyclops. But if it were a battle of brains the minotaur.Answer 2:There was no such fight, so what is the use guessing?
if its on ice nhl if not nfl
It would be a tie and then they would go for shoots of ouzo :)
I can't even guess but it would be an interesting fight.
Palkia would
sonic
Kratos.
Catwoman would win.
Catwoman would win.
Catwoman would win.
Catwoman would win.
A spartan because of his shild and he starts training when he is one
Chuck Norris
Vann would completely crush Mr. Krabbs common sense
Batman always prevails in the end.
Thor would win because of his strenght and from his hamemr. Even though Batman can escape scenes in the dark knight but he can't escapse a explosion of ligtning.