answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There are a lot of books that aren't in the Bible, regardless of age or focus, but I presume you're referring specifically to the Apocrypha and/or the gnostic texts. For the latter, there are actually a few criteria that any book had to meet to be accepted into the New Testament canon:

Author: The author of the book in question had to have seen the risen Christ in person or, in the cases of Mark and Luke, been transcribing information given to them directly by someone who had. The gnostic texts in particular, for example, were largely written after that generation had died off and were attributed to apostles in their titles as an attempt to appear authentic.

Consistency: While each gospel is written from a different perspective, and therefore each has a different emphasis and slight differences in narrative format, they could not be accepted if they contradicted with each other.

Acceptance: This one is more a means of testing the others. The majority of the books in the New Testament had been distributed individually throughout the Roman Empire. Because of the way they were distributed, the books could be traced back to their source, which gives knowledge on when it was written and by whom. Newer books were not as widely accepted, and could be traced back to much more recent times and non-apostolic sources.

I feel like there were a couple others, but these three alone rule out most of the books that are raised in questions like this. As for the Apocrypha, they aren't actually New Testament, and therefore weren't considered when the canon was finally set down. The Jewish canon was closed later by the Jewish religious leaders. I don't actually know what criteria they used, hopefully another user of the site will come in and include that. Many of the apocryphal books are included in the Catholic bible, but not in others. Protestants believe that these books are, as Martin Luther described them, good for learning about the Jewish religion at the time of Christ and history between the Testaments, but not for gaining knowledge of or connection with God. Outside of the Roman Catholic church, they are largely not considered to have been inspired by God.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why are 14 books not in the bible?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How many books of the Bible speak about fear?

All but 14 To the best of my knowledge


Who is traditionally considered the author of 14 books of the new testament?

Paul is known to be the author of 13 books of the Bible, and probably was of Hebrews as well.


Are there 3000 books in the Bible?

No. In Christian Bible there is 73 books - but Protestant Bible have 66 books.


What is the number od books in the Bible?

73 books in the Bible There are 67 books in the Protestant Bible.


How many books of the Bible are there?

There are 66 books of the bible.


Does the Bible consists of 27 books?

no there is 66 books of the bible


What Bible has only 64 books?

The bible has 66 books.


How many books not included in Bible?

there are 66 books in the bible


There are how many books there in the Bible?

There are 66 books within the bible.


Why can't the word Bible be found in the books?

By books, I am inferring that you are talking about the books in the bible. The reason why it can't be found is because the bible is made up of the books. The bible is sort like a collection of all books, it is not one book. The books also took place before the bible was made.


How have Bible books got their names?

The bible books get their name from the authors or to whom the books were written


How many books are the French Bible?

There are 25 books in the French bible.