This is the one flaw in the "Electoral College" system we use to elect The President of the United States of America. In certain (very rare) situations the popular vote does not accuratly reflect the electoral college vote. one drawback of having a representitive democracy.
Horatio Seymour as their candidate. Seymour was the Governor of New York at the time and had previously served as the mayor of Utica. He was known for his conservative viewpoints and his opposition to Reconstruction policies. Despite his efforts, Grant won the election and became the 18th President of the United States.
The democrats split over the slavery issue and ended up running two candidates. The Whigs broke apart earlier and did not run a national candidate. Many northern Whigs joined the new Republican party and their candidate, Lincoln, won enough states to win the election despite no southern support.
Thomas Jefferson was elected in 1800 despite a tie vote in the electoral college. His running mate, Aaron Burr got the same number of votes and Burr apparently saw a chance to be president despite his agreement to run for vice president. The House gave the election to Jefferson after much debate. ( The 12th amendment was soon added to the Constitution to prevent an recurrence of this kind of thing.)
According to historical records, there have been five instances in which a candidate was able to win the presidency by receiving a majority of Electoral College votes while losing the popular vote. These cases occurred in the elections of 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016. In each of these instances, the candidate who won the Electoral College vote ended up becoming the President, despite not receiving the majority of the popular vote.
Open elections allow for voters, despite particular political party affiliation to elect a political candidate across party lines. This is usually held on special election periods.
Bush won the electoral vote despite losing the national popular vote. George W. Bush won the 2000 presidential election defeating Albert Gore, Jr. In the 2000 presidential election George W. Bush received 271 (50.5%) electoral votes and Albert Gore, Jr. received 266 (49.5%) electoral votes. The popular vote totals were Gore 50,996,582 (50.3%) and Bush 50,456,062 (49.7%). Green Party candidate Ralph Nader won 2,882,955 popular votes. Nader did not receive any electoral votes.
Benjamin Harrison won the 1888 presidential election defeating incumbent President Grover Cleveland. In the 1888 presidential election Benjamin Harrison received 233 electoral votes and Grover Cleveland received 168 electoral votes. The popular vote totals were Cleveland 5,534,488 and Harrison 5,443,892.
In the 2004 presidential election, Howard Dean was widely acknowledged for making the most effective use of the Internet as a campaign tool. He utilized online platforms to engage grassroots supporters, raise funds, and spread his message. Despite not winning the Democratic nomination, Dean's innovative use of the Internet set a precedent for future political campaigns.
Bush won the electoral vote despite losing the national popular vote. George W. Bush won the 2000 presidential election defeating Albert Gore, Jr. In the 2000 presidential election George W. Bush received 271 (50.5%) electoral votes and Albert Gore, Jr. received 266 (49.5%) electoral votes. The popular vote totals were Gore 50,996,582 (50.3%) and Bush 50,456,062 (49.7%). Green Party candidate Ralph Nader won 2,882,955 popular votes. Nader did not receive any electoral votes.
The electoral college has decided the outcome of several presidential elections in US history. Some notable examples include the elections of 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016. In these cases, the candidate who won the majority of the electoral college votes became the president, despite not winning the popular vote.
No. At the time this question was asked, the Presidential General Election had not yet taken place.
The Democratic primary campaign to be the nominee for the Party in the November 2016 presidential election was between Senator Bernie Sanders and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton. The favorite in the race was Ms. Clinton. Upon her nomination, almost every national poll had Ms Clinton to win the presidential election. Despite winning the majority of voters by several million, Ms Clinton lost to Republican Donald Trump. The Electoral College votes gave Trump the election. Despite disappointment with the US Constitution's Electoral College has never been changed. This has been true even when one party or the other had a significant majorities in Congress and in US state legislations. It is unlikely the Electoral College will be altered.To make this point, let's look to an extreme example. In 1860, Abraham Lincoln won the presidential election with about 41% of the popular vote. He had a good majority of votes in the Electoral College.It is understood that he would not win a majority of the popular vote in that there were 4 candidates running. Nevertheless, this extreme example is how Lincoln won the election despite the fact that most people did not vote for him.