Dennis R. MacDonald has studied Mark's Gospel and found surprising parallels between this account and the Homeric epics of The Iliad and The Odyssey, which he documents and analyses in The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark. He says that just as Odysseus can reveal his identity to those who are his allies but must keep it a secret from those who oppose him until the time is right, so also Jesus reveals his identity to his allies but must keep it a secret from those who oppose him until the time is right.
MacDonald's analysis may seem strained in isolation from the fuller analysis, but there should be no disputing that Mark, the original New Testament gospel and principal source for the gospels that followed, is not entirely historical. The chiastic structure of Mark is, by itself, undeniable evidence of this. And if the gospel is not entirely historical, it is possible that the author was indeed influenced by the Greek classics.
A more mundane possibility is that when Mark's Gospel was written, approximately 70 CE, a reader could wonder why few had ever heard of Jesus and the great miracles he performed. This could have been preempted by portraying Jesus as telling the people not to tell others about him.
Dennis R. MacDonald (The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark) believes he has a convincing explanation for this reluctance on the part of Jesus. He begins by describing what scholars of antiquity take for granted, which is that anyone who learned to write Greek in the ancient world learned by studying Homer's epics. Homer was the textbook. Students were taught to imitate Homer, even when writing on other subjects, or to rewrite passages of Homer in prose, using different vocabulary. MacDonald says we can know for certain that the author of Mark's Gospel was thoroughly familiar with the works of Homer and well-trained in recasting Homeric verse into new prose tales. MacDonald demonstrates many parallels between Mark's Gospel, on the one hand, and the Odyssey and the Iliad in the other. He makes a surprisingly solid case for the view that the first gospel was actually written around Homer's epics.
In MacDonald's words, Mark "thoroughly, cleverly, and strategically emulated" stories in Homer and the Old Testament, merging two great cultural classics, in order "to depict Jesus as more compassionate, powerful, noble, and inured to suffering than Odysseus." In the Iliad, Odysseus had to keep his identity secret, and thus Jesus also sought to keep his identity secret.
Rather than have people reach conclusions based on sensational or possibly distorted reports, Jesus wanted them to see for themselves that he was the Christ and to make a personal decision based on that evidence. This also fulfilled the prophetic words spoken through Isaiah. (Isaiah 42:1-4)
Peter and john
AnswerSurprisingly, in the synoptic gospels and especially in Mark's Gospel, Jesus did not perform miracles in order to attract followers. He frequently told those he cured to tell no one about him.
The religious leaders once asked Jesus by what power or authority he performed signs and miracles?
Jesus miracles proved that He was divine. In all His miracles faith was a major ingredient.
I don't think people considered the accounts of Jesus as miracles but the things Jesus did were certainly miracles. Healing the sick, blind and crippled etc are miracles in anybody's language
The nature of miracles of Jesus showed that Jesus had sovereign power over the nature forces.
There are too many miracles that Peter and the other disciples witnessed to be listed here. We can not even count the number as we are told in the Gospels that Jesus traveled around to the towns and synagogues preaching and working wonders (miracles). Peter and the other disciples traveled with Jesus so you can be sure that they saw very many wondrous things done by Jesus. If you really care how many miracles are listed i suggest you read the Gospels in the New Testament.
Many believed in jesus Christ after the miracles, like the Roman centurion.
Jesus performed 19 miracles in Luke.
The miracles performed by Jesus should not be regarded as magic tricks.
Jesus did a great deal of miracles in the short time he was here.
John refers to the miracles performed by Jesus as "signs" in the Gospel of John. These signs were meant to demonstrate Jesus' divine nature and identity as the Son of God. Each miracle serves as a revelation of Jesus' power and authority.