Want this question answered?
Rutherford's model has a centralized nucleus that contains protons and neutrons with orbiting electrons. This is wrong because the electrons are shown in stable orbits and they actually exist in probability clouds.
its hard and pointy like a penis. uh uh uh uh
it became the basis for all chemistry from then on
The orbital revolutionof the electron is not expected to be stable.Any particle in a circular orbit would undergo accleration. During accleration,charged particles would radiate energy.Thus,revolving electrons would lose energy and finally fall into nucleus.If they were so,the atom would be highly unstable and hence matter would not exist in the form that we know.We know that atoms are quite stable.
your stupid. you should know the answer to this. that's why its called "ask.com". get it right.
Ernest Rutherford. Added: I would think Neils Bohr here. Clarification: I think it was Rutherford. Bohr's work came after the "Rutherford Model". There are many places to read about this, eg Wikipedia " Rutherford Model". Certainly Bohr refined the Rutherford Model even before his quantum ideas for the hydrogen atom. That's why the "planetary model" is sometimes called the "Rutherford-Bohr Model."
Rutherford explained that all the positive charge was concentrated at the centre and the electrons revolved around it. But this theory was discarded as a charged particle undergoing circular motion would accelerate and an accelerating particle looses energy. Hence, the electron would fall into the nucleus and the atom will collapse. But this doesn't happen. So, Rutherford's model of atom was discarded.
In Rutherford's model of the atom the electrons had a circular motion around the nucleus. By the laws of physics, if something is going in a circular motion then it must be accelerating and a particle that accelerates is losing energy. This means that the electrons that are revolving around the nucleus would eventually fall into the nucleus. Nucleus would eventually collapse. This does not happen therefore the Rutherford model was put aside.
Rutherford's model has a centralized nucleus that contains protons and neutrons with orbiting electrons. This is wrong because the electrons are shown in stable orbits and they actually exist in probability clouds.
Niels Bohr (1885-1962) was a young Danish physicist and a student of Rutherford. He believed Rutherford's model needed improvement. So in 1913 Bohr changed Rutherford's model to include newer discoveries about how the energy of an atom changes when it absorbs or emits light. He considered the simplest atom, hydrogen, which has one electron. Bohr proposed that an electron is found only in specific circular paths, or orbits, around the nucleus. With help from your mother of course .
its hard and pointy like a penis. uh uh uh uh
it became the basis for all chemistry from then on
The atomic nucleus.When Rutherford noticed that small amounts of alpha particles (Helium nuclei) fired through a thin gold foil would veer off course, he deduced that the atom could be composed of a large, negative area (the electron "orbits") and a small, positive area (the nucleus). Through this experiment, Rutherford disproved J.J. Thompson's "Plum pudding model" and introduced his own "Planetary Model".
mathematically it was calculated that for the Rutherford model to be stable it would require that 1000 or more electrons be in a single atom, but atoms only have (naturally occurring atoms) less than 100 electrons.
I'm sure that if there had ever been a President Rutherford he would have had a slogan. But since there has never been a President Rutherford I guess the answer would be "no". I wonder if you are really asking about President Rutherford B. Hayes......
because the extent of the period is probably correct but if this was correct the life on this world would not exist. and i love my mom
Rutherford compared an atom to a solar system. But this would mean that as the electrons rotate they radiate energy and as they do so the radius of their path would keep on decreasing and would ultimately collide with the nucleus and the atom would be destroyed. but we know that this does not happen. Bohr on the other hand stated that the electrons rotate in specific orbits.