they didn't, they were kidnapped
it was a chance for the slaves to become catholics.
The taking of slaves from the African continent for a period of about 200 years.
Assuming that you are talking about the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade (the taking of African Slaves to European Colonies in the Americas) -- roughly 10-20 million people, most of those slaves were Animists whose religions would have resembled Voodoo or Santeria. There were small minorities of Muslims, but most European slave traders, especially the Spaniards and Portuguese, avoided ports in northern Africa where most slaves were Muslim due to their hatred of Muslims.If you are referring to the Trans-Saharan Slave Trade (the taking of African Slaves to the Islamic Empires in North Africa, Spain, and the Middle East) -- roughly 5-10 million people, these groups were almost exclusively Non-Muslim, specifically because it was against Islamic Law to enslave fellow Muslims. Again, these people were likely Animists whose religions would have resembled Voodoo or Santeria. However, most of the African Kingdoms from which the Arab Slavers would have purchased these slaves would have been Islamic countries. (This is in contrast to the ports for Europeans which usually put the Europeans in contact with Non-Islamic African Kingdoms.)
everyone who was taking africans and using them as slaves were profiting from them so africans thought they could do it to make money off of the slaves being taken
African tribes would war with each other and sell the captured as slaves. Africa had an excess of slaves, the US was in a growth period and needed more labor. Simple economics. In the past there have been slaves from all over the world and of all colors. That particular period of history simply had a predominance of African slaves available and the largest demand was from the US at the time.
Europeans captured slaves in Africa by indirect means. After establishing trade with coastal societies, the Europeans would convert and enlist the local populace to raid the interior of Africa. These raids would capture, usually, the enemies of the enlisted Africans, but given the right price the raiders were not afraid of capturing friendly tribesmen as well.
if the rulers are good and have the thought to help people then they will try or rulers will complete their right wishes and if rulers are bad they will not complete people wishes or they will complete by taking bribe from people
The slave trade in West Africa has a long history, predating the arrival of the Europeans by centuries. Traditionally - and until the end of slavery in the 19th century - the procurers were the local African chiefs and kings, who either acquired slaves by taking prisoners of war, or by making raids into their neighbour's territories with the express purposes of catching people to sell as slaves. Transport within Africa of slaves was often arranged by Arab slave-traders. Until the late 17th century, the Arab countries were also the major buyers/slaveholders. With the rise of sugar and cotton plantations in the Americas the Europeans became the biggest buyers and they established slave-collecting and transportation posts along the West African coast, encouraging traders and offering good prices. This of course was a powerful incentive to local kings and traders to step up their efforts.
To intimidate and subjugate recently freed slaves.
African kings enslaved other Africans for money and weapons. Eventually the west coast of Africa would eventually run out of available slaves and kings would move inland and bring more slaves to the Europeans.AnswerAfrican kings enslaved other africans for money andweapons. Eventually the west coast of Africa would eventually run out of avalible slaves and kings would move inland and bring more slaves to the Europeans. Does this make Europeans less reprehensible for the enslavment of Africans? That's for you to decide
Interactions between the Native Americans and Europeans was customarily done from ethnocentrism on both sides. Europeans had two main ways of connecting with the natives. They either treated them in an inhumane way, such as making them slaves, or simply taking their possessions, or they were treated as heathens, who needed to be converted to Christianity. Natives either were willing to trade and work with the whites, perhaps due to earlier positive experiences with Europeans, or they were hostile based on what they felt was an encroachment on their territory.
the aboriginals fought with the European settlers because they europeans were taking over their land.