The NEW Testament, however, was not always as it was. Twenty of the twenty-seven books were deemed authentic by the early Church (the 'homologoumena') as their providence was without question. However the remaining seven (Hebrews, 2 and 3 John, 2 Peter, Jude, James, Revelation--were disputed for a time by particular churches, and were therefore styled "Antilegomena" (or disputed). By the start of the fourth century they were accepted by many churches but not finally accepted until the end of that century.
The main controversy comes with what Protestants would call 'the apocrypha', and which Catholics include in scripture. This is a collection of fourteen books namely, 1 and 2 Esdras, Tobit, Judith, the rest of Esther, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, the Song of the Three Children, the Story of Susannah, Bel and the Dragon, the Prayer of Manasses, and 1 and 2 Maccabees.
Protestants call the disputed books the 'Apocrypha', meaning 'hidden', because they were deemed to be of unknown authority and maybe even spurious. As an example, divine authority is claimed by none of the writers, and by some it is virtually disowned (2 Mac. 2:23; 15:38). The books also contain statements that disagree with history (Baruch 1:2, compared with Jer. 43:6,7), and are self-contradictory, and opposed to some of the doctrines that are formulated from scripture. Very few of the early Church fathers regarded these books as canonical, nor were they included in any list of canonical writings during the first four centuries after Christ's birth. It wasn't until the Council of Trent, in 1545, that they were definitely declared to be an integral portion of Holy Scripture as acknowledged by the Roman Catholic Church - long after the beginning of the Reformation.
So, the Catholic's didn't 'change' what the Bible says but equaly did not write the scriptures not protect them. The story of the formation of the canon of scripture is a lot more complex than that.
In other words, the Catholic Church is the author and guardian of Sacred Scripture, she has guarded and copied it for two thousand years, using it to preach and teach. The Catholic Church never changed anything in the Bible, for that you would have to look at the various heretics.
The pope never contradicts the Bible. He may contradict what certain groups, particularly Protestants, THINK the Bible says. The Magisterium of the Church has the final say as to how Catholics should interpret the Bible.
No. However, they can change the way it is interpreted. I disagree, my friend. They can change the way CATHOLICS interpret the Bible, i think is what you mean?
the Bible IS the word of God
Catholics are scattered across the globe. But most Catholics in the bible are from Jerusalem
Roman Catholic AnswerThe Bible used by Catholics is called the Holy Bible, or the Sacred Scriptures, or just simply the Bible. It is a translation of the original Bible used by Jesus and the Apostles.
The King James Version is a translation of the Bible in English by King James I of England. It is not considered a Catholic version.
they keep the holy bible in a glass case
Catholics do not fear it as there is little truth to it. It is not considered canonical.
The reason Catholics confess to a priest is because they claim that the priest is simply relaying what you said to God. But, even this statement is contradicting the Bible. 1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; There is only one "middle-man" between you and God, and that is the man Christ Jesus. So unless we put Catholicism in authority over what the Bible actually says, the Catholics are 100% wrong in the case of confessing their sins to a priest.
why did the tudor,s loyalty to the catholics change
Yes. The Bible.
Yes