Because they are so far away.
It is closer to us than the other stars so we get a much, much larger fraction of its light compared to other stars. The other stars are so far away that even stars that are much brighter than our sun can only transmit such a small fraction of their light that the tiny fraction we get is consequently much less than the larger fraction of our somewhat dimmer sun.
It is closer to us than the other stars so we get a much, much larger fraction of its light compared to other stars. The other stars are so far away that even stars that are much brighter than our sun can only transmit such a small fraction of their light that the tiny fraction we get is consequently much less than the larger fraction of our somewhat dimmer sun.
No. Asteroids are tiny compared to stars.
Because they are so far away, they seem tiny, because of perspective.
If you refer to the diameter, a neutron is tiny - only 20-30 kilometers in diameter. In comparison, main sequence stars have a diameter of at least several hundred thousand kilometers.
There are other channels you get. The tiny stars on the radio represent the other channels. You got those tiny stars when you got the Exp card.
It is closer to us than the other stars so we get a much, much larger fraction of its light compared to other stars. The other stars are so far away that even stars that are much brighter than our sun can only transmit such a small fraction of their light that the tiny fraction we get is consequently much less than the larger fraction of our somewhat dimmer sun.
It is closer to us than the other stars so we get a much, much larger fraction of its light compared to other stars. The other stars are so far away that even stars that are much brighter than our sun can only transmit such a small fraction of their light that the tiny fraction we get is consequently much less than the larger fraction of our somewhat dimmer sun.
It is closer to us than the other stars so we get a much, much larger fraction of its light compared to other stars. The other stars are so far away that even stars that are much brighter than our sun can only transmit such a small fraction of their light that the tiny fraction we get is consequently much less than the larger fraction of our somewhat dimmer sun.
They are not. Stars are actually enormous, far larger than Earth. They appear small only because they are unimaginable far away.
A:No. Stars are just like our sun, but so enormously distant that they seem like a tiny speck of light. Angels are concepts in some religions, but if they exist they are certainly not stars.
No. Asteroids are tiny compared to stars.
Unfortuately a trip to Mars is only a very tiny distance compared to the distances of stars, so you would definitely see the same constellations as you see here.
I cannot understand your question. But, the stars are billions and billions of miles away from us, except the Sun, of course. Scientists called astronomers DO name and number the stars. There is only time enough to number a tiny portion of all the stars. Just in our Milky Way galaxy there are billions of stars. Think about the fact that there are billions of other galaxies in the universe.
Shooting stars are not stars at all. They are tiny bits of debris, usually rock or dust. They completely burn up in our atmosphere (most of them) and so when you see one 'vanish', it is, in fact, gone.
it only takes a tiny, tiny, little amount that you cant see or smell, but other animals can.
Because they are so far away, they seem tiny, because of perspective.